Department of Energy takes on Electronics with Paul Scheihing

John Shegerian: Listen to the Impact Podcast, on all your favorite podcast platforms, including Apple, iTunes, Google Podcast, Amazon Music, iHeartRadio, Audible, Spotify, Stitcher, and of course, at impactpodcast.com. This edition of the Impact Podcast is brought to you by Engage. Engage is a digital booking platform revolutionizing the talent booking industry with thousands of athletes, celebrities, entrepreneurs, and business leaders. Engage is the go-to spot for booking talent, speeches, custom experiences, live streams, and much more. For more information on Engage or to book talent today, visit letsengage.com

John: Hi, this is John Shegerian. I never could have imagined when we started. The “Green is Good Radio Show” back in 2006. That it would grow into a big podcast called the”Green is Good” podcast. And now we’ve evolved that podcast to the Impact Podcast, which is more inclusive and more diverse than ever before. But we did look back recently at some of our timeless “Green is Good” interviews and decided to share some of them with you now. So enjoy one of our great “Green is Good” episodes from our archives. And next week, I’ll be back with a fresh and new episode of the Impact Podcast. Thanks again for listening. I’m grateful to all of you. This is John Shegerian.

John: Welcome to another edition of “Green is Good.” This is the emerging green edition of “Green is Good” and beautiful downtown Portland, and we’re so honored to have you with us today, Paul Scheihing. He’s the Technology Manager of the US Department of Energy, the advanced manufacturing office. Welcome to “Green is Good,” Paul.

Paul Scheihing: Thank you for having me.

John: Oh, happy to have you! And before we get to talking about all the great work you’re doing for DOE, I like you just to share Paul Syers’ journey with our listeners and our viewers on how you even got interested in energy and sustainability and all the great things that we’re talking about here at emerging green.

Paul: Yeah. So I was trained and educated as a Mechanical Engineer, and I worked for 10 years in the private sector, actually designing gas turbine engines. And I have always had an interest in energy, probably, starting in my college days. And then, I applied to work at the Department of Energy, and it’s been an interesting journey. Done a lot of different things. And the last few years, I’ve kind of focused my efforts on Energy Management, which is turned out to be a phenomenal area to be in.

John: It’s one of the hottest areas. This sounds good, right?

Paul: Yeah. So, it’s been very exciting, and of course I really my passion is to work with the US manufacturing sector. Because energy has such an important role in improving the productivity of manufacturing plants. And as you know, things today are very competitive worldwide. And energy can play a good part in helping companies to be competitive and improve the environment at the same time.

John: Yeah. So interesting. And so, your area at the US Department of Energy when it says, Technology Manager, Advanced Manufacturing Office. What is that? Is that just for large manufacturers in the United States? Is that for OEMs in the electronic sector? How many sectors is that cover?

Paul: Includes all the sectors. So, if you look at the US manufacturing sector, you’re talking about 200,000 facilities in the United States. And you’re talking about us. I think itself is 15% of our economy is making Goods. It also comprises 1/3 of the nation’s energy consumption is manufacturing some type of product. Of course, there’s a variety of sectors that comprise that energy. Some of the key ones are, of course, chemicals, paper refining, food processing, steel, and aluminum. And then, others are more downstream in the supply chain, such as plastics, automotive, and electronics. And but we will be if you look at the electronics sectors after you’re really dealing with the whole supply chain of extracting the materials from the mine to making the individual components, whether it be a printed wiring board or the integrated circuit or the memory board or the plastics that go into your electronic products.

John: Right! Right, right. So, you’re here at the emerging Green conference, and of course, we’re talking about the circular economy. I’m talking about sustainability. You also have a program at DOE called SEP.

Paul: Mm-uhm.

John: So, can you share a little bit about what you’re talking about here? And what, and how does that interrelate to what you’re doing and what your favorite programs are at DOE?

Paul: Okay. So, if you look at the Superior Energy Performance program or SEP.

John: Okay.

Paul: It is about the continual improvement of energy performance.

John: Okay.

Paul: And we do that under SEP using the ISO 50001 Energy Management Standard. So, ISO 50001 is similar to other ISO Management Systems such as ISO 14000 or ISO 9000, but this time we’re focusing on energy alone. And that’s Structured Management System helps companies to continually improve. And this standard is very young, just about 4 years old. And so, the US DOE is working with the manufacturing sector to increase the uptake of ISO 50001. And we do that through SEP because SEP adds extra energy performance verification on top of ISO 50001. And that verifies the value that the companies are getting. In addition to that, you can extend that even further to verify the greenhouse gases that the company is reducing as a result of its energy management efforts.

John: When did this SEP roll out?

Paul: In 2013, we rolled it out. And to date, we have 27 facilities that have been certified.

John: Wow. And how many more are in the process of getting certified?

Paul: About 50 others. The main uptake we’re getting right now is working with 5 companies to scale it across their Enterprises.

John: Their Enterprise.

Paul: Nissan, 3M, General Dynamics, Schneider Electric, and Commons[?] are working with us to see how they can extend SEP beyond just one facility across the Enterprise. And there, then you get the Economies of Scale of doing that, of course.

John: Wow. And for our listeners and viewers out there that want to learn more about the SEP program that Paul is very involved with, you go to

www.energy.gov/isosep. So, you’re going to be speaking at this and this conference. Who else are you going to be on your panel, and how are you interrelating it with sort of closing the circular economy?

Paul: Yeah, it’s a great question. So, if you look at a typical electronic product, it will vary, but in some electronic products, there could be 5X more energy consumed by the manufacturer of that product as opposed to the use of that product.

John: Interesting.

Paul: So, a lot of the focus up to now, in a good way, has been on reducing the energy consumption of the use. But we have so far to go with improving the manufacturer of those components that comprise the electronic product. So, the SEP program could do, is to help original equipment manufacturers to work with their suppliers to continually improve their energy performance.

John: Right, right.

Paul: And then other people on the panel would be HP and Qantas International, which has developed a Life Cycle Analysis Tool with a group of manufacturing companies, including HP. And then we also brought in 3M, who has, there, a supplier to the electronics industry. Wanted to have one example in particular. They’re one of the leaders in adopting the SEP program. They’re kind of a world leader in energy management, so they’re going to speak on that.

John: Gotcha, gotcha. Talk a little bit about what you thought was going to happen when you started rolling out SEP. What actually happens? Some of the challenges, but some of the unintended benefits also.

Paul: Yeah. So, some of the challenges, of course, is a new thing, but that’s always the case. We also have found that there’s a lot of training needed, a lot of education. We’re trying to create a skill. Taking 2 types of people, one that knows management systems and one that knows energy engineering, combined that into one person who built more of those people who know both of us things. We also had some kind of surprises. The companies initially were kind of reluctant about the third-party certification. Maybe the was a little bit of a risk to them. Maybe they were kind of putting themselves out by being more transparent, and as it’s turned out, the companies really like it. Because the energy teams put all this work into putting the SEP program in place. Now they have a 3rd party come in and say, “yeah, you did say 10%.” And that allows them to go to the Plant Manager or their decision-makers to demonstrate that they really got a return on investment for all the effort they put in.

John: Gotcha, gotcha! Besides the brands that you just mentioned. The great brands you just mentioned, such as 3M and others that are putting this across their Enterprise, what’s the future of SEP? What’s the future, even on a macro level, for Energy Management because it seems like everyone’s talking about it?

Paul: Well, if you look, if you take a global view-

John: Yeah.

Paul: Okay.

John: Yeah.

Paul: I bet you’d be surprised to know that 40% of the world’s energy is industrial making things.

John: Okay.

Paul: Okay, it tends to be an area. Maybe that doesn’t get as much attention because things are like the energy for our cars and our buildings-

John: Sure.

Paul: -are a little more transparent to us.

John: Sure.

Paul: But 40% of the world’s energy is making things. So, we’re finding that the average SEP plan is, say 10%t in the 1st 18 months. So, the potential of a typical manufacturing plant could be 15%-30%, right? Over a 5, 10-year period. And any features translate that across that 40 % of the world’s energy footprint, our carbon footprint. You know, it’ll take some time, but you can see the potential there.

John: Years ago, we had a great guest from the energy sector, not from the D OE but from the private sector, on the show, and I forgot the number, but I wanted you to tell me what the real numbers and he said to me the future of energy is in no longer creating solar so to speak. He said it’s managing the grid[?[(11:56)] better. I said, “I don’t understand what you mean.” This is a 3 or 4 years ago discussion on the show.

Paul: Mm-uhm.

John: And he said, “listen, John, if you take all the energy that’s produced in the world,” he goes, “at least,” and he gave me a number. I want to say 50% is being wasted on all of that.

Paul: Absolutely, it is.

John: Is that number true?

Paul: It’s somewhere in that way. Yeah.

John: [crosstalk[(12:16)]And I appreciate. That’s amazing.

Paul: Yeah, and remember, the cleanest energy we have is the BTU that we don’t consume, right?

John: Right!

Paul: We don’t have to treat that. We don’t have to worry about so-

John: You’re filling that void that he told me about 3 or 4 years ago in one big-.

Paul: In 1 element, yeah.

John: That’s huge!

Paul: There are other courses with a lot of clean technologies[crosstalk] that can get towards that 50% potential.

John: Of course. Right.

Paul: Approximately.

John: Right.

Paul: Yeah.

John: That’s the opportunity, then.

Paul: Yeah. So, you really want to be managing your facility excellently, right?

John: Yeah.

Paul: If you’re going to be adopting all these clean technologies-

John: Sure.

Paul: -they both think they go hand in hand.

John: They go hand in hand.

Paul: Mm-uhm.

John: Talk a little bit about other energy. You know, for our listeners out there,

everyone wants to understand. We don’t want to anymore. We found in less than 7 years since we’ve been doing this show, is that listeners are excited to learn, but they also want like a step-off pointer window to a door to walk through.

Paul: Yes, yeah.

John: How can our listeners and our viewers, Paul become more energy-efficient themselves? Give some solutions or suggestions that you have because you’re right in the middle of all of them.

Paul: Yeah. Well, I would say if we’re talking about a manufacturing facility.

John: Yeah!

Paul: Maybe not every facility is ready to jump in, do SEP right away.

John: Right.

Paul: Or IOS 50001, right?

John: Right.

Paul: I would suggest that they look at putting some type of structured Energy Management program in place. And my suggestion to them is to go to our website and Google eGuide DOE.

John: eGuide?

Paul: Yeah. eGuide DOE.

John: Okay.

Paul: This is a tool basically that helps any kind of facility to manage their energy and gives them those first 10 or 20 steps to do. A step-by-step process. Things like you put your energy team together. Go beyond a person. Come up with a plan. Get the plan manager and whoever is controlling your resources to support your team. Get a goal. Assess your energy.

John: Sure. With regards to what you just said on a macro basis. For our listeners and viewers and take it down, more micro to what why we’re here today for electronic manufacturers and the electronic supply chain. How can we get better at this? I mean, where do you see some of the lowest-hanging fruit?

Paul: Low-hanging fruit is in adopting a more systematic Energy Management program.

John: Okay.

Paul: And what we have found, the average plan again, let’s say, 10% and 3 quarters of that savings are from operational behavioral improvement not having to spend any money. Simply by the team’s real understanding of how their energy is used. Pinpointing those big areas in your facility that use the most energy and see how you can optimize that.

John: Wow, wow! Final thoughts. We’re down to the last couple of minutes. Paul, share your final thoughts with our listeners and viewers on energy, sustainability, and anything else about SEP or that you want to share.

Paul: Yeah. In terms of the electronic industry, I guess, please take a look at SEP.

John: Okay.

Paul: What we’re trying to do is to incorporate a SEP as part of sustainability standards that the electronic industry can use. And that the large OEMs that make the products can work with their suppliers. And there are hundreds, not thousands, of suppliers who work with 1 or 2 of them initially to demonstrate that Energy Management is a cost-effective pathway to reducing your energy and carbon footprint.

John: Got it. Well, thank you for being with us today, Paul.

Paul: Thank you. Yeah.

John: For our listeners out there, again, to learn more about what Paul and his great colleagues at the DOE are doing, please go to www.energy.gov/isosep and also download when you’re on that site, eGuide DOE.

Paul: Yeah, or Google it or even search it.

John: Or Google it. Yeah. eGuide DOE, which will give you the beginning steps to get your plan in a more energy-efficient manner.

Paul: Yes.

John: Wow. Paul Syers, he’s the Technology Manager of the US Department of Energy, the Advanced Manufacturing Office. Thank you for making the world a better place. You are truly living proof that “Green is Good.” Thank you so much.

Paul: Thank you, sir.

John: Thank you.

John: This edition of the Impact Podcast is brought to you by ERI. ERI has a mission to protect people, the planet, and your privacy. And it is the largest fully integrated IT in Electronics Asset Disposition Provider and Cybersecurity-Focused Hardware Destruction Company in the United States and maybe even the world. For more information on how ERI can help your business properly dispose of outdated electronic hardware devices. Please visit eridirect.com.

Making the Most of Life’s Essential Resources with Karla Robertson

Karla Robertson currently serves as executive vice president, general counsel, secretary and chief social responsibility officer of Pentair. In this role, she oversees all aspects of legal, compliance, privacy and insurance matters as well as leading the Company’s social responsibility strategy.

John Shegerian: Get the latest Impact episodes right now in your inbox each week. Subscribe by entering your email at impactpodcast.com to make sure you never miss an interview. This edition of the Impact podcast is brought to you by ERI. ERI has a mission to protect people, the planet, and your privacy, and is the largest fully integrated IT and electronics asset disposition provider and cybersecurity focused hardware destruction company in the United States, and maybe even the world. For more information on how ERI can help your business properly dispose of outdated electronic hardware devices, please visit eridirect.com

John: Welcome to another edition of the Impact podcast. I’m John Shegerian and we’re so honored to have with us today, Karla Robertson. She’s the executive vice president, general counsel secretary, and chief social responsibility officer of Pentair. Welcome, Karla, to the Impact podcast.

Karla Robertson: Well, thank you so much, John. Thanks for having me.

John: It is just an honor to have you. You’re doing very impactful and important work at Pentair. But before we go into all the interesting things you’re doing a Pentair with your colleagues, can you share a little bit about your background? Where did you grow up and where did you go to school and how did you even get here, Karla?

Karla: Sure. I’m coming to you from Golden Valley Minneapolis. It’s just suburb of Minneapolis. And I happened to be from Minnesota, right? I was born in Minneapolis, not so far from where the Pentair US management offices are. I was born and raised in and around the Twin Cities, and then I headed to… I graduated from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities as well. And then I headed to law school in Denver, Colorado. I went to law school in Denver and then started making my way back to the Midwest. One of the things about Minnesota is it has a great pull. If you’re from here, a lot of people tend to come back here. That’s my story. I started to make my way back to Minnesota by way of Iowa. After law school, I clerked for a federal judge in Iowa and did that for a couple years and then came back up north and started my law career at a law firm called Favor and Benson, which is now Figree Drinker Biddle and Wreath. And I did private law practice for 5 years. Went from there to Target and after Target, I… A bit known fact about me is that I stayed home for a year with my first child, my daughter, and then decided to go back into the workforce and went to Super Value Distribution Company doing food distribution, which is now UNFI. It was purchased actually by UNFI.

John: Right.

Karla: And then from there, I ended up at Pentair and came to be the general counsel here at Pentair. And I’ve been here almost 5 years. So, that’s a little bit of my career journey that brought me here today.

John: That’s fascinating. When you were at Target and at Super Value, were you a general counsel there or assistant general counsel at those great organizations as well?

Karla: Yes, they’re all great organizations. Figree’s as well. I started actually in the law being an employment lawyer.

John: Oh, okay.

Karla: I started employment law and then I sort of went into litigation more generally. I was an employment lawyer at Target, started out employment laws at Super Value, and then did become general counsel and was general counsel for about 4 years while I was at Super Value. And then I came over to Pentair as their GC. I’ve started in a different place than I am now, that’s for sure.

John: You joined Pentair in about 2017, right?

Karla: Yes.

John: As a general counsel, when did you also take on the extra role of secretary and chief social responsibility officer?

Karla: I’ve always been the secretary. That’s really a big part of governance. Being a general counsel and a secretary’s sort of a package deal in my case.

John: Okay.

Karla: Yes, it’s a package deal. And then 2 years ago, I had the additional role of chief social responsibility officer.

John: Was that a call to action of the company and you raised your hand and put your name in the hat? Or did they anoint you? How did that even happen? Because that’s a fascinating… I get to interview a lot of wonderful folks over the last 15 years in these… Chief impact officers or CSRs or chief social responsibility officers and even chief sustainability officers. Your background’s fascinating leading up to that. How did that actually come about?

Karla: To me, it seems to fit quite beautifully actually because I think corporate social responsibility, as you may call it, or sustainability or ESG, pick whatever term. I think there are variations on the theme. They’re really a mix in my view of business strategy, governance compliance, regulatory and really at the heart is really creating long-term value for the company, long-term shareholder value and long-term value for stakeholders. And so, I think as a general counsel, as a lawyer, and as a key business partner, because I also really think that being a lawyer and being a good one is to be a key business partner to the operations in the business, really is uniquely positioned to combine all of those. I can talk a little bit about who and what Pentair is a little bit more but Pentair is a leading provider of smart sustainable solutions that really addresses water needs. And it has a long history, a great rich history, of being a sustainable products and solutions provider. We’ve done that in a variety of ways, again, which I’ll talk about in a minute. That history was there with Pentair and when they appointed me to be the chief social responsibility officer, it was really around, I think, elevating and sort of taking what they’d already been doing to another level and formalizing that work into service centralized program, working throughout the businesses, appointing me as a leader, and they thought I was uniquely positioned to lead the efforts forward based upon my background and also interest and position at the company. It just was a unique opportunity to take, again, the good works and to propel it forward. I’m really proud of the work that we’ve been able to do there.

John: That’s great. And for our listeners and viewers out there, to find Karla and her colleagues at Pentair, you can go to www.pentair.com. Talk a little bit about Pentair first. Let’s first set the table for how big is Pentair? Your headquarters are over in Minneapolis, the beautiful city of Minneapolis, as you and I were discussing a little bit off the air before we started taping. How big is Pentair in terms of employee size and geography?

Karla: Another interesting fact about Pentair, I mentioned we’re headquartered here. We have our US operations and management offices here, but we’re actually incorporated in Ireland. We’re an Irish PLC and we’re also domiciled in the UK with our US management offices here in Golden Valley. It’s a very global company.

John: Wow.

Karla: It poses a lot of interesting issues and things to address being global. We have over 11,000 employees that are across the globe, about 11,250. And we do serve customers in, I think, about 150 countries globally. And so, it’s a very global company with, again, operations, also plants and manufacturing operations throughout the globe.

John: Wow. Now, you get this new role 5 years ago as general counsel and secretary. Now, that’s something you’re really good at anyway. You were already trained to be a lawyer, educated to be a lawyer, and already had a lot of practice at that. But 2 years ago, chief social responsibility officer, right in the middle of the pandemic. Now, you have a global company with 11,000 employees. Where do you start? What’s the starting point and what’s your point of reference on where to even begin?

Karla: Again, going back to Pentair’s great history of really being committed to and having a proven track record of having products and solutions that really drive sustainability. We’ve been a leader and we provide products and solutions for enjoying water, and we have products and solutions on the pool pad. So, if you have a pool, there’s a great chance that you might have a Pentair filter, pump, maybe some lights. Pentair’s had a great track record, as I said, of providing energy efficient and energy saving resources products in various areas.

John: Right.

Karla: So, we have that to build on. We also had and have an amazing board of directors who are great. They’re a committed body of people who are very committed to, again, driving long-term value for the company and very astute and interested in leading also through ESG. You have a great track record in our products and solutions, you have incredible board who’s strategic and has a vision, and you have a great CEO. And our CEO, John Stout, who also understood that we have the opportunity to really elevate our leadership position in ESG and being a leader in the manufacturing space for sustainable products and solutions. So, that was a great starting place.

John: Right.

Karla: It wasn’t like we were starting from zero. We had that as a great foundation and then from there, with the board support and John and our CEO support, and already a great record, we then went out and knew that we wanted to really formalize the program. And we thought we sort of were on the right track already with some of the things that we’re doing but we wanted to make sure what we were going to do going forward matched what our stakeholders cared about, right? So, we went out and did an assessment and got lots of input and lots of feedback from our shared feedback, from our shareholders, our customers, our employees, different groups. And we collected it all and invalidated a lot of what we’re doing and then crystallized the other areas that we were going to focus on going forward. We simulated that all and took some time to understand it to sort of assimilate it and then craft our strategy and then at the same time, built the team under the program and then just went off and went from there with all the types of things you would imagine launching and implementing your strategy.

John: I come from a family of lawyers. My daughter who’s above my shoulder here, she’s an employment lawyer. My brother’s an employment lawyer. My son’s a lawyer. In your legal team, with your legal hat on, how big is your legal team about approximately?

Karla: Give or take, rough and tough, 50 people.

John: Okay. So now, for your chief social responsibility officer team, which is now only 2 years in the making, how big is that team? You’ve explained that you gathered the evidence and the information from all the stakeholders, but now, building a team and you’re going to set ambitious and achievable goals. Explain how many team members you have to get to begin this journey and then talk a little bit about some of the ambitious and achievable goals that you set off to achieve.

Karla: The team that I have now, I think we’re a mighty team of 5 and that’s including myself. We’re so small but mighty. I think of it as that’s a centralized team. But when I really think about the power of Pentair over 11,000 strong, I think we have a potential team of over 11,000 people. And so, I really think of it as ESG, social responsibility, comes alive through and by our employees. It is around engaging our employees. And there’s all different levels of those. The executive team and management, leadership, and everywhere from that level all the way down to the folks in our plants. This is just really a call to action around things that matter, gets engagement up. And so, I think of the team as the centralized effort to really work across the enterprise to really drive the initiatives because that’s actually critical to the success. I think of that in a couple ways. And then to the second part of your question around these ambitious but achievable targets, absolutely. Once we did what we would call an ESG materiality assessment, what I just described of getting all that in, we then took it as simulated. Again, talked about it, the results, with our leadership team and the board and then set out. We then launched 5 strategic target areas that had 5 strategic targets included in them. We did that and launched and communicated those just in 2021. Not that long ago.

John: Wow.

Karla: And again, we are very deliberate and thoughtful about what those would be aligned to the Pentair business, aligned to the Pentair strategy, and aligned to how we want to be a leader going forward.

John: I got you. Now, I love the idea of Pentair people because you’re right. They become your ambassadors, your evangelists. Your communication then with your mighty team of 5, which you’re one of the five, obviously then communicating to the 11,000 what you’re doing to get them to buy in to become ambassadors and evangelists of everything you’re up to is important. How does that communication look like on a regular basis?

Karla: That’s a full-time commitment and job of the team. I think you might be able to say we may possibly have a full-time of 5 and a half because we have another member of our team. And I say this for a reason, who is actually dotted line into our team, but he works in our technology team. He happens to be a water engineer, really driving water conservation projects. That’s just an example of we draw from various places in the organization as we drive the strategy and move forward the project plan. The team is engaged in exactly what you say, reaching out to people across the enterprise, having ongoing meetings, sharing the milestones that we set out to achieve.

One of the things that I’ll talk about a bit is we have a target around product design for sustainability. And that target is also comprised of engineers throughout all of our business units. It’s a working team, right? We have a leader from my team who’s ensuring that the milestones are met and we’re driving forward in progress. But the work, the ideas, really, the motion of forward progress is really made by this working team and of people across the enterprise.

John: Karla, you’re early in this so I don’t want to ask any unfair questions. You’re 2 years into this with your team, but also one year into the launch because the first year was gathering all the information from the stakeholders to be able to formulate the right plan and vision. You bring up a very important point. Talk about tracking the goals and out of the 5 goals that you have, do all of them have different target dates in terms of your vision, in terms of accomplishing them. And go back to design for sustainability because design for sustainability, Karla, has become a very huge deal with all the big OEMs around the world. It sounds like that’s where the world is moving now. People want to make their products more sustainable because the constituent base that’s voting with their pocketbooks is very interested in more sustainable products.

Karla: Yes, that’s absolutely a trend. We might call a mega trend and you, a day-to-day trend. Absolutely. We have, as I mentioned, 5 targets and they reflect who we are and what we care about and what our business strategy is. Two of these targets are really focused on how we can sort of minimize our impact on the environment as we operate in our manufacturing facilities and in our own operations. And that is reducing our carbon footprint. It’s a greenhouse gas reduction target. And that is to reduce our greenhouse gas scope one and scope 2 emissions by 50% by 2030. That’s one of our targets. The second is…

John: Great.

Karla: Yes, it’s a great target. We talked about the progress we’ve made there. The second is to reduce our water withdrawal, that we save water usage. We want to target a 30% reduction of our overall water withdrawal, again, by 2030. And that’s by the baseline that we’ve set. So, those are about how we’re operating.

John: Right.

Karla: The next target in the environmental space is exactly what you said. It’s all about our products and solutions.

John: Right.

Karla: And what we’re providing for our customers and how we’re designing with sustainability in mind. That has a couple components to it. The general theme being innovating with sustainability in mind, and we’re doing that through a product sustainability scorecard that we created, which is quite unique and innovative. We incorporated that product scorecard into our design process. And so going forward, 100% of our new products are being assessed against the scorecard. And then we have additional things that we’re trying to achieve into the future on that. And then the remaining 2 targets are all about our supply chain. As you kind of alluded to, it’s not just us but it’s what’s happening in our supply chain. And really building a more socially responsible supply chain is another one of our targets, and then diversity and inclusion is very important to us at Pentair. That’s part of the S of ESG and being a more diverse and inclusive workplace and increasing the diversity at the company rounds out our targets.

John: I got it. As you track the progress, are they reported in corporate responsibility reports? Is that how it goes?

Karla: Yes, thanks for that. We have an entire mechanism for tracking. Tracking is extremely important. It’s becoming even more important if you’ve ever were following the SEC proposed rules, right? The integrity of data and tracking is really at the core of the compliance aspect of how we operate. And so, we’ve got various technology solutions and mechanisms for tracking. And then we have reported out for a corporate responsibility report that we issue annually, our progress to targets.

John: I got it. When you talk about innovating with sustainability in mind, is that the design for sustainability? Is that that element of the 5 goals?

Karla: It is. That has been so fun. All of this is fun for me, right? It’s been fun. That’s been an incredibly fun component of what we’re focused on. Again, it just builds on the history and legacy of Pentair, and it’s exactly what we hear. It’s what we hear from our customers. It’s what we hear from our partners. Having more sustainable products, having products that really consider sustainability throughout the design process is at the core of what we’re focused on.

John: And you get to work with engineers and hear about how they think. It’s a whole different methodology of thinking that. That actually gets to be, I’m sure, for you, fun or at least different.

Karla: Well, it’s both of those and it’s just ingenious and genius. I hear about the various ideas, just also thinking about the work that we’re doing on water conservation on our inner operations and the things that our engineers and our lead engineers working on these projects come up with as solutions. It’s it’s amazing.

John: This is the Impact podcast and I love your website. Again, for our listeners and viewers, to find Karla and her colleagues and all the important work they’re doing, you could go to www.pentair.com. I’m on your website now, and I’m on your impact page, which I love. Can you talk a little bit about it? And I see here your corporate responsibility report, your strategic targets. So much information. Share a little bit about your vision for this impact page and why is it so clear? Why is it so darn important to your vision, your CEO’s vision, and how you’re driving the future of Pentair and getting 11,000 plus people to evangelize all this great important work you’re doing?

Karla: I think Pentair is an exciting company with an exciting mission vision purpose. And really, at the heart of that is our commitment to our leadership on sustainability. And we’ve really seen that come alive through our website and our impact page and our presence on social media. We’ve tracked our interests or hits and visits and how long people stay in pages. And I have to tell you, since we launched our program and established it, we’ve seen more and more interest on all of our various forums out there. And our impact page is one of them. People come and they want to visit. And when I say people, it’s a variety of people. It’s customers, it’s shareholders and it’s prospective employees. I will tell you, as I mentioned, we have such an amazing group of employees at Pentair. And what we hear from prospective employees is people really are interested in the Pentair story. They’re really interested in our commitment, our leadership on ESG. And people come to our website and they want to check it out and they see it in action, right? They see our corporate responsibility report. They see our metrics and how we’re tracking them. We seek to be transparent with publishing our progress to targets. And it really comes alive for people who want to know about us and who also want to be affiliated with a leader in this space like us.

John: Talk about the industry as a whole. I’m not familiar with your industry but how do you benchmark against- Do you benchmark against your competitors and where is your industry overall headed right now, Karla, from your perspective?

Karla: Just as you mentioned, it’s becoming more and more important to focus on it no matter what industry you’re in, right? To be focused on sustainability and ESG. If people weren’t focused on it before, they’re going to be focused on it now based upon the attention from the SEC in this Administration. So, I think you’re seeing companies across the board focusing on it. But I do think that particularly since we’re so focused on water, and we’re providing products and solutions to move and improve and enjoy water, that that’s at the core of really what we do. And so, we’ll look around other companies that provide products and solutions in the water space, absolutely. And we benchmark with other similarly situated companies. We offer a variety of products and solutions. So, it’s in, perhaps, various sectors that we’ll look and see what others are doing. Absolutely. We also look at just some of the leaders generally in ESG and more broadly. And as we advance on the maturity curve, we look to who we think are real leaders more generally even though they may not be exactly in the same space as we are.

John: You’ve been doing this for 2 years. You’ve made tremendous progress. I’m so impressed by this, not just by the progress you’ve made and the goals that you’ve set, but just how you report them in such a transparent way on your website, on the impact side of your website. What are your opportunities and goals and priorities for the next 2 years and beyond, Karla?

Karla: Well, certainly, at the top of the list is to continue to work towards enabling the Pentair business strategy because we see, obviously, sustainability part and parcel to what we’re doing as a company. And so, being really integrated with the business and working together to drive value for Pentair stakeholders. So that’s always something that we’re focused on first and foremost. And that’s what our strategies are built on. We then also, of course, in doing so, want to make progress towards our targets. We think as we make progress towards our targets, it’s going to continue to help drive that long-term value. We are going to continue over the next 2 years and more to do what we can to continue our great momentum. And we also have a long-term strategy that we have, that’s looking out 5 to 10 years. And that certainly will continue to evolve. We’ll change it as we need to. But it’s to continue to innovate. Product innovation is a real big focus. And continuing to, I would say, be an employer of choice. That’s the key part of all this. And to be a destination of choice for prospective employers, to have our employers just continue to want to love being here and engage with our ESG initiatives.

John: Well, Karla, thank you so much for spending time with us on the Impact podcast. It’s hard for anybody who listened to this episode not to be Pentair proud. I’m Pentair proud after listening to your mission and to your vision. For our listeners and viewers out there, to find Karla and her great 11,000 colleagues and all the important work they’re doing in corporate social responsibility and in ESG work, go to www.pentair.com. Look up their impact page. It’s amazing. All the information we just discussed today is there and Karla Robertson, you’re always welcome back on the Impact podcast. Thank you for making truly an impact and making the world a better place.

Karla: Thank you so much, John. It was great to spend time with you. Thank you so much.

John: This episode of the Impact podcast is brought to you by Closed-loop Partners. Closed-loop Partners is a leading circular economy investor in the United States with an extensive network of fortune 500 corporate investors, family offices, institutional investors, industry experts, and impact partners. Closed-loop’s platform spans the arc of capital from venture capital to private equity bridging gaps and fostering synergies to scale the circular economy. To find Closed-loop Partners, please go to www.closedlooppartners.com.

Living Progress with Chris Librie

Chris Librie is responsible for driving the strategy and communications for HP Living Progress, HP’s vision of creating a better future for everyone through its actions and innovations. Chris leads a global team focused on demonstrating how HP’s people and technology come together to solve society’s toughest challenges, helping HP build a stronger, more resilient company and a sustainable world. Chris’ background includes branding, marketing, general management and environmental experience. Most recently, Chris directed HP’s worldwide environmental and health initiatives. Prior to joining HP in 2011, Chris worked at S.C. Johnson & Son, where he served as Director, Global Sustainability. Previous roles also include senior positions at Diageo and Unilever.

John Shegerian: Welcome back to Green is Good, and I’m so honored to have with us today Chris Librie. He’s the Senior Director of HP Living Progress. Welcome to Green is Good, Chris.

Chris Librie: Thanks, John. It’s great to be here.

John: This is HP’s second time on Green is Good, but this is the first time we’re going to be talking about Living Progress. For our listeners out there that want to learn more about the HP Living Progress program, you can go to hp.com/livingprogress. Chris, before we get talking about all the subtleties and nuances and important initiatives you’re doing at HP in the Living Progress program, I want you to share first your story, your journey leading up to HP and what you’ve done in the environment and sustainability, and what you are doing. I want you to share your background first with our listeners.

Chris: Thanks. I’d be delighted. I’ve had a career that’s really spanned a few international companies, working mainly in marketing and general management roles until about seven years ago. I’d been involved in a couple of acquisitions at my previous company, SC Johnson, where sustainability issues were certainly material to the acquisition. That kind of got me interested in this field, and when the opportunity arose there to lead the sustainability strategy, it was one that I really wanted to take and move forward. At SC Johnson, the chance was to embed sustainability more fully in the organization. It was certainly a passion of the leadership of that company. Here at HP, we have already a tremendous embedded sustainability program in all of the different functional groups. The challenge is a little different. The challenge is to bring it to the fore and tell the story in a more compelling way and link it better with the overall company strategy. That’s what’s led to Living Progress, which is really something very exciting and something I’m looking forward to talking with you about.

John: I’m so excited you’re here today because there are so many great things I want to speak with you about. First of all, we’re living in the beginnings of time, really, with regards to not only the sustainability revolution, but still also I believe, Chris, the technological revolution. The funny part is if we’re at the top of the second inning of the sustainability revolution and still maybe the bottom of the second on the technology revolution, it can be posited that HP was at the beginning of all time, really, when it comes to Silicon Valley startups and the whole garage mentality of startups that sort of made Silicon Valley the iconic startup venture place in the world right now. It’s so exciting to have you on, talking about technology, sustainability, and a lot of other things. Can you share a little bit about the history of HP and sustainability, where the journey began, where you joined and where you want to take it with HP Living Progress?

Chris: HP has a great history, as you know. In fact, 2015 is our 75th anniversary, so it’s really exciting for us to look back over the history of this great Silicon Valley startup, and remember that Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard were leaders in recognizing the need for sustainability, not only in their company operations but in the world at large. Citizenship is the term that Bill and Dave applied to this work, and it’s been part of the HP strategy for decades. It was first formally called out as part of the overall corporate strategy in 1957, when Silicon Valley was probably more farms and fruit trees than the amazing startups and big companies that it is today. I know a lot of companies say this, but I think we can certainly lay a very strong claim to it being part of our DNA. I know I’ve heard our current CEO, Meg Whitman, say that many times. “This is founder DNA.” That’s a direct quote from her, and she takes it very seriously, not only as a leader and someone who’s engaged in sustainability, but as someone who recognizes the important history and background of this company.

John: I’m on your Living Progress website landing page right now. Again, for our listeners, it’s www.hp.com/livingprogress. First of all, it’s beautiful. Second of all, as you said, from left to right, it first starts with the message from Meg Whitman. Can you share with our listeners what HP Living Progress really means to you, Chris, and what you’re trying to achieve with it there? Chris: It’s really an integrated approach to looking at the triple bottom line. In our terms, that’s human progress, economic progress and environmental progress. We try to look at all three of those factors when we’re considering the products and services that we offer and how we operate as a company. If you want to think of it as kind of a matrix that way, it’s helpful to think of some of the initiatives the company has, the what we do, our products and services, and the how we do it, our global functions and the way we operate, those all integrate back to those three factors of human, economic and environmental progress. We try to find a balance between those in order to ensure that we’re creating a better future through our actions and innovations. That’s really the vision statement behind Living Progress. It’s really all about using our technology to help solve some of the world’s toughest problems. We have a number of examples of that in action, which we can get into during the course of this discussion. It’s a very integrated approach, not only across the triple bottom line, but also with the business. I think that’s what really distinguishes Living Progress as a sustainability platform.

John: One of the success stories I read about is in your HP Earth Insights report. It said, basically, this is a direct quote, “HP created a unique early warning system for threatened species using the power of big data solutions in collaboration with the non-profit Conservation International.” Chris, how do you choose where you’re going to have the greatest impact? Also, talk a little bit with our listeners about the importance of big data now, and how big data can help make a great difference with regards to what you’re trying to accomplish at Living Progress.

Chris: That sounds like two questions in one. Let me see if I can decompartmentalize those. One of the things that we try to do, in addition to our products and services and the way we operate, is we create these collaborative programs. The CI program that you’re highlighting there is a great example of us sitting down. We wanted to create a program that would enable us to showcase HP technology, but in a way that had a direct impact, a positive impact, on an environmental issue. We sat down with CI a number of years ago, and they told us about this program they have, which they were already running in 16 rainforests around the world in 14 different countries. You can kind of imagine a belt roughly around the equator, and they’re located globally, these sites, where they were collecting camera trap information. These are cameras that go off automatically when animals go across their field of vision. They were collecting climate data, they were doing vegetation measurements, and they were just collecting so much data, three terabytes of data, and quite frankly, they couldn’t deal with it. When we heard about this program, we said this is a great example of something that HP could not only help with, we could really revolutionize. We sat down with their scientists at CI. We worked very closely with the team that was doing this work and the scientists doing this work, and we designed for them not only the software that would enable them to analyze these data more quickly but also turned it into a dashboard for them, so that they could see in real time what some of the factors were that were leading to declines in some of those species. This is where we took a process that CI literally was taking months to analyze maybe one animal species, we were able to distill that down to hours, and that’s why the name of the program is Earth Insights. From analyzing data, we were able to turn that into insights more quickly. That enables CI to intervene in those different rainforests or with the governments of those countries, give them advice as to how they can help maybe protect those species more completely. That program is a great example. It really captured the imagination of our company. Meg Whitman highlighted it at one of our sales meetings a little over a year ago, and then in addition to that, it really engaged the two teams internally that were doing the work, our software group, because we were using some proprietary software tools, and also our Enterprise Services team that provided the analytics. It’s really, really a great program for us in terms of showing our technology, but in a way that was having a positive impact. The cool thing about it is it helps to drive the business and get the business behind this program. A really synergistic thing that we were able to do. The reason why we focused on big data, to conquer your other question, is this is an issue that’s certainly facing the world in a big way. I talk about this in a number of contexts and a number of speeches, and almost every time I give this speech, I have to revise the data. At the moment, I think we create in 10 minutes more data than in all of human history up to the year of 2003. Just think about that. It’s amazing the explosion of data in our society due to smart phones, greater connectivity, and we’re all sharing things all the time, pictures, music, you name it. More importantly, data that’s material to helping drive our society to greater economic efficiency. This is just going to continue to explode. There are projections that say by 2020, it’s going to be 50 times what we have today. One of the challenges I think that that presents to a company like HP is that we need to find more energy-efficient ways of managing and providing access to those data. We just know that the middle classes in developing countries are going to continue to grow, and that’s great. We want greater economic mobility and improvement in livelihoods, but in order to be able to continue to provide the data support for that, we need to find more energy-efficient and space-efficient ways of delivering those data.

John: For our listeners that just joined us, we’ve got Chris Librie with us today. He’s the Senior Director of HP Living Progress. To learn more about Living Progress, you can go to www.hp.com/livingprogress or you can come see Chris speak himself in-person May 27th-May 30th at the Sustainatopia conference in Beverly Hills at the Hyatt Regency. Chris will be here. HP is a big sponsor. Chris, talk a little bit about some of the other issues that I see on your great website, the Living Progress website, Moonshot servers, Apollo supercomputers, and the machine. How does that play into what you’re trying to achieve at HP Living Progress?

Chris: Remember, John, Living Progress is all about what we do, our products and services. These are great examples of products and services that are going to not only have a huge environmental impact in terms of improving the environmental footprint of data centers, but by doing that, they’re going to enable human and economic progress because of the connectivity and the access to data issues that I just touched on. In brief, Moonshot is an incredible server technology that uses the chips that we find in our smartphones. These are server cartridges that are 80 percent more space-efficient than the kinds of servers they replace. They are also up to 90 percent more energy-efficient for certain applications than the servers they replace. It’s a quantum leap, really, in terms of space and energy efficiency. One of the things I definitely want to say is that energy is an obvious one when you’re talking about processing data and data centers. I know that topic has been covered a lot, but let’s not forget the space requirements of data centers. It’s the bricks and mortar and the footprint of the building. By reducing the space needs dramatically, as Moonshot has done by using this server on a chip kind of approach, which is basically what the cartridge does, we’ve really revolutionized that paradigm. Moonshot is a great example. It’s in the market. There are five or so different cartridges that cover different types of applications with similar levels of space and energy efficiency. Apollo, which you mentioned, is a supercomputer that’s liquid cooled. What’s really interesting about that is liquid, water, is a much better conductor of heat than air. Most supercomputers are cooled by air. Apollo, by being cooled by water, is much more energy-efficient. Already you get massive improvements in energy efficiency, but what comes on top of that, is that you can then take that water that’s been heated by the supercomputer, and you can use it to heat nearby buildings. It’s an amazing system. We’ve installed a bank of these at the National Energy Research Laboratory in Golden, Colorado, NERL, and we’ve had some amazing results on that campus, where we’ve been able to use the heated water to heat the buildings and thereby get even more efficiencies out of the system. NERL is projecting hundreds of thousands of dollars in savings through that. Those are foundational technologies we have in place right now. The machine, which you mentioned, is something that is a research project we’re working on also right now, but we’re hoping to have in the market in a number of ways in the next couple of years. HP Labs is totally focused on this idea of revolutionizing the architecture around computing and replacing wires with photonics, using lasers to transmit data within the machine, rather than wires. You can imagine how much more energy-efficient that is. Using a technology called memristors, which is a chemical storage of memory that’s non-volatile. It’s not energy-dependent. Basically, you’ve got memory there that doesn’t need to be maintained with electricity. Again, huge improvements in terms of energy efficiency, space efficiency. What the machine is doing is combining the server on a chip from Moonshot, photonics, memristor, in order to create a complete revolution in terms of energy and space efficiency, that’s going to help enable things like the internet of things. We’re not going to be able to manage all the data that comes from planes, smart cars, wearables. All that stuff is going to wind up getting connected at some point, and that’s good because it’s going to provide us with incredible information and the ability to anticipate all sorts of issues, air traffic issues, ground traffic issues, weather issues. All of that stuff is going to help enable economic and human progress, the only way we’ll be able to do that is by totally relooking the architecture of computers.

John: I know, Chris, we’re down to the last two minutes, and it’s so unfair to have you on and talk about HP’s Living Progress in a short period because it’s literally a massive and rich program. What I’m understanding here, from everything you’re discussing, is that innovation is not only alive, but it is exploding at HP, with regards to sustainability and your approach to innovation and sustainability converging is massive at this point.

Chris: Absolutely. That’s really what Meg Whitman wanted us to do with Living Progress. She wanted us to take that wonderful heritage from Bill and Dave, that founder DNA, the embedded nature of it in this organization, and tap into that and use it to help fuel the turnaround, as you said, not only innovation, which really needs to be focused on solving some of society’s toughest challenges, but also engaging the workers and the team and getting people motivated. We’re going through a time of significant change at HP, as we have many times in the past in our 75 years. That’s what Silicon Valley is all about. It’s always changing. One of the constants needs to be sustainability. It needs to be the employee engagement that comes from sustainability. People want to be part of an organization that’s doing something good for society.

John: That’s awesome. Chris, your HP Living Progress is definitely doing something good for society. We’re thankful for you coming on the show. We’re going to have you back. For people who want to come see Chris in person, go to Sustainatopia at the Hyatt Regency at the end of May, May 27th-30th, and see Chris talking about HP Living Progress right there. You can learn more online at hp.com/livingprogress. Thank you, Chris, for being an inspirational leader at HP Living Progress. You are truly living proof that green is good.

Innovative ESG for a Healthier Planet with Lori Hunt

Lori Hunt has been at Amgen for 19 years.  After 9 years in Global Regulatory and Safety, she moved into the newly formed Amgen Transformation Office designed to drive and deliver business transformation across the enterprise.  In that role, Lori led several large cross-functional initiatives and provided training to hundreds of Amgen staff on managing change and building resilience.  In 2021, Lori brought her leadership and transformation skills to Amgen’s Environmental Social Governance work.  Together with a team of ESG experts, Lori has evolved the program to increase scope and transparency and further embed into Amgen’s culture, strategy and decision making.   

John Shegerian: Listen to the Impact Podcast, on all your favorite podcast platforms including Apple iTunes, Google Podcast, Amazon Music, iHeartRadio, Audible, Spotify, Stitcher, and of course, at impactpodcast.com.

John: This edition of the Impact Podcast is brought to you by ERI. ERI has a mission to protect people, the planet, and your privacy. And is the largest fully integrated IT in electronics asset disposition, provider, and cyber-security focused Hardware destruction company in the United States and maybe even the world. For more information on how ERI can help your business properly dispose of outdated electronic Hardware devices. Please visit ERIdirect.com.

John: Welcome to another edition of the Impact Podcast. This is a very special edition. We’ve got Lori Hunt with us. She’s the Executive Director of Environmental Social Governments at Amgen. Welcome to the Impact Podcast, Lori.

Lori Hunt: Thank you very much, John. I’m excited to be here.

John: Well, you hold a very important role in Amgen. And Amgen’s very big company with a very big footprint, that makes really moves the needle when they make big decisions like this, to go all in with ESG and other sustainability like-minded program. But before we get talking about great and important work, you’re doing there. Let’s talk a little bit about Lori Hunt. Where did you grow up and how did you even get here, Lori?

Lori: Okay, well it’s a real privilege to have to work at a great company like Amgen, where our mission is to serve patients, and doubly great to have a role in ESG, where I get to help execute and communicate about all the awesome, amazing work Amgen does.

John: Yeah.

Lori: And that’s a tremendous honor. So, how did I get here? My journey to ESG is probably less traditional than most and decidedly opportunistic and fortuitous. I was in healthcare delivery before Amgen and decided to get my Executive MBA, while I was still working.

John: Okay.

Lori: And in that program, I was on a team with an Amgen employee and she asked me before the program ended to come and work for her. So that was 19 years ago. And I only interviewed that first role after that, I sort of just went with a company needed me. And for the first 9 years that was roles in regulatory and safety, which gave me a great overview of biotechnology. And really helping me to understand the industry and then Amgen made a decision corporately to start a corporate wide business transformation project, and they created an internal group that was of the employees and I ended up being asked to join that, and we, they trained us on a methodology for transformation and change management. And I thought that was also a tremendous opportunity, something I really loved and so I did business transformation for the company for almost 9 years again.

John: Wow.

Lori: Another 9 years. And the part of my client group was actually Corporate Affairs, which is where our corporate responsibility was run out of. So, I’ve been working with them on and off for a few years and I thought I’d retire doing transformation work, honestly. It was so, it was fun and rewarding but my boss and I have had Career Development discussions regularly and I told her after Amgen, I did, I really didn’t know that there was an actual for me. After Amgen, I was thinking I’d go into non-profit and sort of give back, because of what a great company Amgen has been to me and how lucky I felt to end up there. You know, you have to remember we. It’s a suburban community, safe schools, no traffic. I’m six miles from work. How do you find that? Anywhere else in California.

John: That’s like the dream, you’re living easily.

Lori: I used to tell. I know.

John: [laughs]

Lori: And so I always thought I’d leave and then when the company decided to create, to really take CSR and turn it into ESG, they knew they needed a more formal program and she remembered my boss remembered, my interest in non-profit work. And some of the work I’d already done with corporate responsibility and the CEO staff decided they were going to ask me to lead the program, so it was more than just my interest, obviously. They wanted me to bring the transformation tools in the change management methodology to the team and they knew they already had a couple of really deep experts that were in there. So, I didn’t need to be an expert to start. I had that and so now the team and I are working together, it’s been a huge learning journey for me but it’s ignited my passion for ESG. And meanwhile the team and I have expanded the scope and really change the way we talk about.

John: And when was that transition? When did you become the Executive Director of ESG at Amgen?

Lori: March of 2001. So 18 months ago.

John: March of 2021.

Lori: Sorry. 2021.

John: Right. Okay.

Lori: Yeah.

John: Okay. Just want to make sure I have the math right. Great. So, that’s it. Okay. That’s okay. So let’s step back for sure. Our listeners and viewers, first of all, to find Lori and our great colleagues at Amgen you could go to www.amgen.com. Amgen, A-M-G-E-N.com. How big is Amgen, over how many employees, over how many countries, just tee this up and give our listeners and viewers some scope.

Lori: Okay, so we are 24,000 employees roughly.

John: Yup.

Lori: We operate in 100 countries but we only have physical presence in the 75.

John: Got it. No, that’s quite large, you know. That’s a big mountain to climb. So, Lori when you join the Amgen and when I got involved actually in the. Let’s just say the sustainability field. ESG wasn’t part of our vernacular lexicon didn’t exist that acronym. It seems as though ESG now is undeniably here to stay an unstoppable trend that is going to take us from a linear to circular economy. Is that how you see the world as well?

Lori: Yeah. I mean, I got the same thing and you’re going to hear some of my research because [crosstalk] what I’ve found is that the whole concept of ESG is not new. It’s just the jargon.

John: Right.

Lori: It’s the point that is probably changed corporate responsibility has been an important feature in history since antiquity and social purpose was defining trait, even then, there’s been a push-pull relationship with social purpose throughout history, with government’s mandating, or, controlling errant behavior when it occurred. However, corporate responsibility in the recent decades was much more decent reactive to mission. Some of it more about public relations and branding. Where’s the modern ESG that we’re seeing now is integrated with business purpose and inextricably linked to the operations business. So I think the recent momentum that you’ve seen in the ESG has been driven by three factors, sort of some key world events, which I’ll go into, public demand, and then the fact that it’s ESG’s good business. And so, you know, I mean, the public events aren’t going to surprise you that I think have drawn it and that’s the 2015, Paris Climate Accord that gave ESG a shot in the arm.

John: Right.

Lori: You know, because legislators started putting requirements on investors who started putting requirements on companies and, then you had COVID and the death of George Floyd, and those brought out all the key social aspects and made them the prominence the clear implications and global visibility to various types of inequality.

John: Right.

Lori: Then on the public demand side, it’s interesting because I don’t know if you’ve heard of it, but there’s a company called Edelman. Who does the Edelman Trust Barometer annually. In 2021, Edelman Trust Barometer showed, for the first time the public trusted corporations more than any other entity and with that trust comes expectations and demands and it seems that the public believes that governments haven’t been able to solve problems. So they’re turning to corporations to do it. And then we’ve got the constant media barrage of catastrophe, which is made people anxious to support any company doing the right thing, and punish those who are doing the wrong things. Along with that, you’ve got employees, which we every company will tell you. They’re really making demands now. And they can set expectations and employees want to work for companies that are doing the right things and that have a social purpose and that’s driving business everywhere. So, I think those are really the key public demand pieces.

John: I agree with you.

Lori: And then you.

John: I see it your way, but I want to just go into. And although, I see exactly the way you do and I’m so thrilled that someone with your vision is leading Amgen in this very important part of the of our future. What is that recent, quiet behind the scenes, even a little bit in front of the scenes drumbeat been recently with some states divesting themselves of funds that are supporting ESG, good ESG behavior now, their state pension funds, and other type of behavior like that. Why a backwash in ESG? I could see backlashes and other things. But I don’t, I haven’t met a person in any economic strata in society, or any race, or ethnicity or, any political affiliation, that doesn’t want their kids and their grandkids to breathe cleaner air and drink cleaner water, and have more equity in this world. I don’t understand. Why this backlash?

Lori: Yeah. It’s a great question. And I think the best example, I can give you is, since I started in this role.

John: Yeah.

Lori: My brother has been sending me articles at least once a week. Is it a written to oppose or discredit ESG. Its kind of typical older brother, harassment.

John: Right, right.

Lori: But I’m glad he does, because I really believe that to make a cogent argument, you have to understand both sides of the issue.

John: Hundred percent. Yeah, you’re right.

Lori: So my takeaway, rightly or wrongly. My opinion only, is that there are two things irritating, a segment of stakeholders. And they are noisy. But I think they’re small. So one is, when companies way and really loudly on controversial political topics. They aren’t clearly tied to their mission and that’s a little risky. The other, the other thing is that I think there’s actually, especially recently that a mischaracterization about what ESG is supposed to do. So there’s a belief that if a business isn’t by Nature ESG positive, then it shouldn’t be able to have a good ESG score.

But I don’t think that makes sense because the purpose of ESG is to assess the company’s operations for risk and it wants companies to be transparent about their issues and address how they intend to improve them. If a business is legal but unpopular. Let’s take the example of oil producers. It’s still important to know that they’re improving safety for their employees and reducing their carbon footprint and improving safety of their ships to prevent leaks. I think ESG is [inaudible]

John: And have more board diversity and have more exclusivity and other great things that we can do. Right. Got you, make sense.

Lori: So, ESG just evaluates business operations. I think, it’s up to the public to vote with their pocketbooks and their feet. If they don’t like the businesses purpose.

John: That’s so interesting. Some to take me, I’m in the unique position where over the last 15 years, I’ve had about 17,000 or so, wonderful leaders like you come on this show. So some of the common themes that I get learn about is, where you start and where you are, but also where a company started from a Genesis perspective, from culture, and a DNA perspective. So where was Amgen from a cultural and DNA perspective before you took this very important role. So when you started, what did it look like when you started in this role and how have you evolve that culture to create inside champions or ambassadors. To keep this movement and to spread the word since you’re in 100 countries, 75 physically with 24,000 employees. It’s much more than one person can do themselves, obviously.

Lori: Yeah. A lot more than to ourselves.

John: [laughter]

Lori: So let me start with where it was when I started.

John: Right.

Lori: In 1991, they created the Amgen foundation. And that was really our first foray into that corporate responsibility place. And the Amgen Foundation is focused on creating the scientists of the future, we have four educational programs, for students and they run the gamut of contributing to Khan Academy, to online lab exchange, with in training scholars, both in college and high school. And those programs are so mature at this point. Last year alone, we had 27,000 students access. I mean, 27 million, sorry.

John: Wow.

Lori: 27 million students access our content. So, that’s a very exciting program. But the next thing wasn’t until the early 2000s that we started our environmental sustainability team. And at the beginning, it was much more of a grassroots effort and then it grew. And now, it’s of course, it’s probably our most mature element of the eighth. When I joined some time in those two decades between.

I don’t have a lot of good data on it, but we adopted five other elements, because we have seven elements when I joined and they were, business ethics, DINB, responsible sourcing, ethical research, and I am absolutely sure there’s another one. But here’s the problem. So this is what I’m going to tell you as I came in. When I first joined, there were these Seven Elements and they were all great and doing incredible work, but I would get stopped in the hallway and asked tell me about ESG and I could never recall The Seven Elements. So I kept thinking to myself it was like someone asking me about Snow White’s dwarves or Santa’s 12 reindeer. I just couldn’t remember it.

John: Right?

Lori: And so, one of the first things, my team did plus even when I did people don’t know offhand, what ethical research means. So why do I tell you anything? So, one of the first things, my team did is we worked on finding a way that was more aligned to our mission to communicate, what ESG is and we came up with what we call the four health things. Healthy people, healthy society, healthy planet and a healthy Amgen. And the work is still done in those elements that I described because those are the teams in our business that do the work.

But instead of talking about them is their individual elements. We roll them up into these four pillars that are much easier to communicate. And the progress we’ve made with our staff, in having them be able to articulate program and understand what it means to them and to the world is huge. So I think that was one of our first big wins and it was simply, because my memory is not good enough to remember Seven Elements.

John: [laughter] Who can. First of all, I think it, but it’s brilliant, really what your team did was they simplified it and made it made it gettable by everybody. Which is so smart, because then all of a sudden, you have 24,000 evangelist and ambassadors working with you. Moving the needle here.

Lori: That’s right.

John: Yeah, That’s great. Wait a second, so you started. So that’s. So really, let’s go back in 91, that was an educational structure that Amgen created which has now paid massive dividends now that it’s 31 years old or so. With 21 million, 27 million people accessing it and then you started getting involved with sustainability in the early 2000s, which was in the in the United States. A very, very early adoption, comparatively speaking. So really, it’s been really a great part of Amgen’s culture and DNA for quite a long time now. This is not just knew, you didn’t just take the role and start from scratch. It was a lot of substance to work with and start with.

Lori: No. That’s right. And I honestly, I think it’s important, I not take credit for how ingrained ESG is in the culture of Amgen when you start with the mission to serve patients. And I know that all of our peers have missions that are similar. But I’m telling you people really breathing, like people join Amgen because they want to take care of patients, because the disease’s we serve are grievance. This isn’t, you know, this isn’t, never mind.

John: Right.

Lori: You know, we’re treating really serious illness and people stay because we are such a purpose-driven company.

John: Right, right. Talk a little bit about now, you said, where you started and where you are. Talk about your operations, how have you now, integrated ESG into the operations, and how is that evolution been?

Lori: Okay. So, It’s probably when I joined you have The Seven Elements and one of the things we realized was that was still really focused on the corporate responsibility side because ESG covers so much more. So we added a variety of topics that we cover like cyber security, and product quality, and product safety and, human capital management. Which are previously were so ingrained into the culture of our company, in the way we work that nobody had ever considered them as items that might fall under ESG or be have disclosure requirements. So, that was a big part of our first year, to was adopting, those new places. So then if I gave you the example of how it’s ingrained. I want to come back to cyber-security.

John: Yeah. Me too.

Lori: [laughter] I know, that’s a favorite of yours.

John: Yes. It is.

Lori: So protecting personal information that’s been entrusted to us is extremely important.

John: That’s right.

Lori: But we don’t stop there Amgen created a global community of employees security advocates called Sentinels. And this program is one of the largest of its kind in the private sector with over 800 employee participants, representing 34 countries in every function within the company. So this has the benefit of making information security, everyone’s job and we’re all aware of how important it is.

John: Right. Got it.

Lori: And let you come inside the studio, I can give you another example, which would you prefer?

John: Well, I want to hear more a little bit about your cyber-security six list. This is great. This is awesome.

Lori: The other example, we have is. Do you know manufacturing drugs for patients?

John: Yeah.

Lori: You know. We have to focus on cost-effectiveness. But it never comes at the cost of quality. So Amgen builds in quality beginning with the design of the medicine, all the way through to the development, manufacturing distribution to patients and we include more than 250 quality checks, and perform an in-depth analysis of our manufacturing performance to continuously improve it for every product.

John: Wow.

Lori: A few examples of how it’s ingrained deeply into our operations.

John: Yeah. Great examples and for those listeners and viewers who just joined us this we have Lori Hunt with us today. She’s the Executive Director ESG at Amgen to find Lori and her wonderful colleagues you can go to www.amgen.com. Lori, 75 countries you have physical facilities. A 100 companies are in, you got 24,000 employees. ESG means a lot, can be taken widely ordinarily. How do you assess the geography that you’re in and continue to move the the mission forward while assessing all the exterior geographies that you’re dealing with, not just the United States, being a Director of ESG for a company, that’s just located in the United States is one challenge unto itself. You are now head of ESG at Amgen, which is a multinational corporation. How does that juggling act work for you?

Lori: So, it doesn’t feel like too much of a juggling act, honestly. And maybe the way we’re structured, because what my team’s job is to report the global ESG’s information.

John: Okay.

Lori: So you know whether that’s environmental information or DINB information, whatever it is, but each of our country offices, a lot of them have also started local reporting. So some of them because they want to, and some of them because it’s becoming required, like in Europe.

John: Right.

Lori: And so the bigger challenge that I’m having isn’t so much the juggling trying to figure out, you know, where to worry about geographies. But instead, I need to make sure our messages and our data all rules up to the same numbers. And you know, there’s someone out there with way too much time on their hands who’s going to calculate it up if I’m not careful. So I have to be on top of the way every country does its own public reporting or statements about our ESG work and that’s been the challenge and trying to sort of wrangle all of that.

John: Well speaking about then that rolls perfectly into my next question. How did you decide to track your ESG progress and then report on it? Because I’ve read a lot of impact for ESG or CSR reports that called different things for different organizations. And that could also be a very different landscape in terms of progress, tracking the progress, and reporting on it. How did you choose the algorithms that work for Amgen?

Lori: Yeah, so we do an annual stakeholder assessment, where we ask our employees, we asked investors, we do social listening to hear what all of our stakeholders universally feel is important for us to be paying attention to. There’s also rating agencies who are happy to tell me what they think is important. And we do take that, we take that feedback as well.

John: Okay.

Lori: But, you know, we balance it out with the rest of it and based on that, we scoped our program each year and it doesn’t get smaller but it does get bigger, when we add new things. It’s not that we’re doing something different. It’s that we’re now talking about something different [crosstalk]. I mean, there are occasions where we’ve started something new, but not tremendously often, as I said, this companies operates without me at a very high level of ESG effectiveness. It’s my job to communicate that. So that’s what I try to do. And I based it a lot of it off of stakeholder assessment.

John: How often do you benchmark? What you’re doing at Amgen and what your Amgen colleagues doing against in dissimilar industry, you know, reports and then also different industry reports.

Lori: So, I would. My staff would probably tell you. We do it constantly, it feels like that certainly it’s one of the services my team provides to the company so it’s rarely that we do the entire program at one time, but we picked element by element or topic by topic and we will go benchmark against our peers. I have all of their URLs right there on my quick list.

John: Right, right.

Lori: It’s non-industry peers. We Benchmark most commonly when we are looking to do something, none of our peers have done. So the example, I would give you a cyber-security, when we decided we wanted to add that none of our peers in it. It’s not that they don’t mention it, they just don’t dig into it, and they don’t have a ton of information. I had to go outside of our industry and look at industries that we’re doing a much deeper dive into their cyber-security, so that I could get an idea of what, you know, is good from a transparency perspective.

John: It makes total sense. Where we stand today as we go into the fourth quarter of 2020. Talk a little bit about yourself personally. Hopeful about where we’re headed as a world, as an environment, as climate change, climate risk, and where we’re headed, or give me some of your thoughts on where things are going.

Lori: Well, you promised me no hard questions.

John: [laughter] I lied.

Lori: I would say that I am personally pretty helpful.

John: Yeah.

Lori: I worry that were, you know, in a pretty divided universe right now. But if the way that my colleagues at Amgen, you know, just get through it and do their work and continue to focus on the right things to do for patients and discovering new drugs and making sure that we’re improving access. If I base my theories on that, then I’m pretty positive.

John: Got it. You’ve been in this role for at least 18, or 19 months or so. What is the next two or three years now that we’re starting, think gosh, coming out of COVID. What is the next two or three years look like for you in terms of driving the mission forward?

Lori: Well, are we have several goals that are very important to us, you know, under our Healthy Planet Killer, for example, we have announced for road to NetZero and that is all of our metrics are based on a 2019 baseline, but it’s our goal to achieve carbon neutrality for Amgen owned an operated facilities and operations reduce water consumption by 40%, and reduce waste disposed by 75%. So, those things are definitely examples of what’s on our list for the next years to come and where we are so far, interestingly in renewable energy sources. Last year, 79 percent of Amgen’s total energy consumption was renewable.

John: Wow.

Lori: And that was a 41% in 2020, and I’m really excited to see the numbers for 2022 at the end of this year. We also [crosstalk]

John: Sorry. I’m interrupting you. When you listed all those things in terms of, you know, Carbon neutrality and your NetZero goals. Is it the same year as your goal line or different goal line for the different for the topics?

Lori: For those three topics of water, waste, and carbon. Our target is May 27.

John: Got it. Perfect. Go ahead. I’m sorry, I interrupted you.

Lori: That’s okay.

John: Huge progress and energy. Wow.

Lori: And we have lots of concrete examples. Like, we’re converting 30% of our Fleet to electric cars. Our Fleet is, of course, driven by our sales and medical reps and we’re opening a new plant in Ohio and Rhode Island and both of those will be cutting-edge technologies that are much more efficient and environmentally friendly than traditional plans.

John: So did you have to? So when you’re embarking on those kind of things with your heart assets of your company, you have to work on issues, such as LEED certification of the building, in terms of energy water and all that. All those other things that come with it.

Lori: That is right and we aim to be LEED certified in both those facilities.

John: Congratulations. That’s huge. That’s huge, that’s exciting.

Lori: Thank you.

John: That’s very exciting. It’s exciting. And how does that [crosstalk].

Lori: And on the social side those same facilities are going to allow us to hire 750 new jobs and those facilities are in very diverse communities on purpose.

John: Right.

Lori: Because that continues to be also a key target for us to improve our diversity.

John: Obviously, you took this role during COVID. So travel really wasn’t part of the deal. Will travel become more part of your role in the coming months and years ahead.

Lori: No, I don’t think so. Partly, because we’ve really proven, you can work from anywhere and Amgen is a, we have a virtual first policy. And so if you need to come to the office, you’re welcome to come to the office. But we prefer people work virtually if it is as productive as far as when people will need to travel internationally, that’s still up in the air. As far as, you know, what’ll make sense for the company. I think, overall our travel will never go back to what it was pre-COVID.

John: Right.

Lori: We’ve learned enough things about how to work, that we won’t need to.

John: Do you get to go to conferences with other ESG Directors from around the United States and around the world and share best practices, is that part of also what you do?

Lori: It is. Most of the conferences I have been to so far have been virtual.

John: Right.

Lori: And obviously, those would be reasons to travel but my preference will always be virtual because I lose too much time in the travel.

John: Yeah.

Lori: Well then I couldn’t be working with my team.

John: Yeah. And how big is your team now?

Lori: I have four people working for me.

John: Wow. That sounds still for 24,000 employees in 100 countries in 75 countries physically, that doesn’t even sound like all that much. For all the work that you’re accomplishing.

Lori: Well, if you were thinking about. Major disclaimer, this is not my work I’m talking to you about, right? I, my work is to communicate it. Pull it together into a coherent story. There are thousands of people at Amgen doing the work. I’m trying to describe

John: Right. I know.

Lori: And my job is to bring them together.

John: That’s awesome, Lori. So what did you expect going into this role that didn’t happen and what didn’t you expect that did happen after you took this role?

Lori: So what did happen that I expected was that, I got to spend a lot of time focused on the sort of extra, the beyond goodness things that Amgen do and that that’s great, to wake up every day and do that.

John: But you did expect emails from your older brother and they came.

Lori: I actually didn’t.

John: Oh, really?

Lori: This is the first job I’ve had where he has really been sort of on top of it. I mean, he used to give me trouble in other ways, but now this one is because he’s in the Banking industry. So, this is his world as well.

John: Interesting, Interesting. Lori, you’re, you know, we could sit here for hours last thoughts. I would love you to have the last thoughts before we say goodbye for today, because what you’re doing is such important work, not only for Amgen just for the world at large because when companies like Amgen do the important work that you’re doing and go, like you said beyond caring for patients and really go all in on ESG. Other companies get inspired to follow big and small. So I’ll leave you for the last words and then I’ll do our sign off at the end here.

Lori: Okay. I think ESG isn’t perfect, but I think it’s the right direction for the evolution of corporate responsibility, as time has gone on, and although things may change parts of It. Ultimately, I believe that ESG is here to stay and that it’s the right thing for business and that companies who are worried about getting into it are going to find it works for them. So I encourage people to learn about it and institute it wherever they can.

John: Lori, thank you for all the great work you’re doing in sustainability and ESG at Amgen, to find Lori and her important and great colleagues and their great work, that they’re doing beyond caring for patients. Please go to www.amgen.com. Lori Hunt, you’re making a huge impact on this planet and so is Amgen, I thank you for your time today. You’re always welcome back on the Impact Podcast, and thank you for the great work you continue to do.

Lori: Thank you.

John: This episode of the Impact Podcast is brought to you by Closed Loop Partners. Closed Loop Partners is a leading circular economy investor in the United States with an extensive network of fortune 500 corporate investors, family offices, institutional investors, industry experts, and impact partners. Closed Loops platform spans the arc of capital from venture capital to private equity, bridging gaps, and fostering synergies to scale the circular economy. To find Closed Loop Partners, please go to www.closedlooppartners.com.

The Water Reuse Revolution with Jon Freedman

John Shegerian: Welcome to another edition of Green Is Good. This is the IGEL Wharton GE water innovation technology edition of Green Is Good here in beautiful downtown San Francisco, and we’re here with my friend who made this event possible, Jon Freedman. Jon, welcome to Green Is Good, again.

Jon: Thank you, John. It’s great to be here today, again.

John: Well, you were the one when you kindly and graciously came on Green Is Good some months back and invited me up here today, and we’ve been having just such an interesting time with all the thought leaders that you’ve brought together to this great conference that you’re putting on and GE is hosting. First of all, before we get talking about what we’re doing here today, talk a little bit about Jon Freedman, because we had got today viewers and listeners around the world that missed the first time we did this and I want them to hear a little bit about your background in both innovation and sustainability and the creation – little secret here – of Ecomagination at GE.

Jon: Well, I’ll start with our common connection, the Wharton School.

John: Thank you.

Jon: And 25 years ago – or whenever it was – when I was a lawyer and not particularly thrilled with that career I thought, “Hey. I hear there’s this school,” and it was kind of like a witness protection program. In other words, you could go and kind of change your identity and that was kind of how I looked at it. I had no idea what I wanted to do, but I thought – like all the other people at Wharton – I’d probably go into investment banking or something like that.

John: Right.

Jon: I ended up going to a real estate developer, John, and I became Vice President of General Counsel, but it was owned by a French water company called Suez Environment. So I ended up in the water industry. Fast forwarding, when I joined GE, one of the first things I did was I got to be the project leader for the creation of our global environmental sustainability initiative called Ecomagination.

John: Wow. And so you’re a recovering lawyer. Jon: Yes. John: And you’re a proud Wharton grad.

Jon: MBA in Finance.

John: MBA in Finance. I mean, my gosh. And now you’re a leader, one of the great leaders of GE Water. And for our listeners out there that want to learn more about GE Water, it’s www.GEwater.com to go learn about what you and your colleagues are creating there and doing in terms of water and technology and innovation to make the world a better place.

Jon: Exactly. And I actually got to put my Wharton degree to work, because when I joined GE 14 years ago, I was initially the mergers and acquisitions leader responsible for building a water business because GE didn’t have a water business at the time.

John: Wow. And you built it, and now there are approximately 1,000 installations or so around the world?

Jon: First of all, we’re an advanced wastewater treatment technology company and we have 50,000 customers in 130 countries.

 John: Wow. And you’re in charge. I know your office is approximately four blocks from the White House.

Jon: Three blocks.

John: Three blocks from the White House and you’re in charge of government affairs?

Jon: Yeah. So I’m the Global Government Affairs Leader but also now the Global Partnerships Leader for the business.

John: Wow.

Jon: So I work with governments around the world but also our kind of largest customers.

John: So let’s talk about today. You put together this very important conference. We’re here in Northern California in San Francisco very close to Silicon Valley – maybe the ground zero for innovation in the world, potentially, if you want to look at it that way – in California, where the drought is one of the highest nails in the world in terms of water shortages, and we’re in the middle of 2015. Where are we right now in this evolutionary compendium of water, water technology and breakthrough? And with regards to the visibility that you have, to everything that’s out there including the amazing technology that you have at your fingertips at GE?

Jon: Here’s where I think we are: Five years ago McKinsey and Company released a report and they said, “Hey, the world has reached a tipping point where demand for water now exceeds supply,” and I think we’re seeing that play out. Not just here in California, which is in now the fourth year of its worst drought in the past 500, but in places like Brazil, which has 13 percent of the world’s freshwater resources. In Sao Paulo, the taps are running dry. In China. In obvious places like the Middle East. But it’s kind of a global phenomenon, so we are seeing increasing water scarcity. There was a fellow here today from the World Resources Institute who talked about that. So that’s the backdrop, increasing water scarcity because of an imbalance between demand and supply. So that really brings up the question: “What do we do about it?” – and I think there’s a lot we can do about it. I think we can solve the challenge. The first thing is we need to conserve water, and that is happening here in California. Governor Brown recently announced a 25 percent conservation goal, right? You had to reduce consumption by 25 percent. The second thing is desalination. It’s a great option to have particularly if you have coastline like California does. But what’s the problem with desalination? It’s expensive and extremely energy intensive. So it’s not great if you’re living in a carbon-constrained world, which we are. Then the third thing you can do is take wastewater, instead of discharging it into oceans and rivers, dirty treat it further so that it can be reused for things like agriculture, industry and even drinking water. And by the way, it uses about half the energy of desalination and it costs about half as much on average. So that is really the thing to focus on as we search for solutions.

John: Reuse and recycling because you – GE – has now membrane technology that allow reuse and recycling in both grey and blackwater to be used for everything like as you say commercial, industrial and even home use.

Jon: Absolutely. You can recover 99 percent of wastewater through the existing technology.

John: I just want you to frame this up for our viewers and listeners. This is so important. You shared this with me the last time you came on the show. When you look at the recycling rates – and I want you to share the recycling rates in Israel and Singapore versus California and the U.S. – from a macro level, how does that frame up?

Jon: Globally, the world is reusing about 3 to 4 percent of its wastewater.

John: OK.

Jon: In the U.S., it’s 6 to 8 percent and here in California it’s 8 to 10 percent – although, I have seen some studies that say as high as 13 percent.

John: OK.

Jon: That’s the U.S. This is good news. Why? Because it means that we have this huge opportunity we can capitalize on to address scarcity, which we’re now seeing. So that’s great. Israel – where they’ve had scarcity forever – they’re reusing 85 to 90 percent of their wastewater today.

John: Wow.

Jon: So that tells you where we can go. Singapore is reusing 30 percent of their water. Why? They want to be water independent of Malaysia. They punch way above their weight in terms of water reuse policies and technologies so they’re doing a great job. Saudi Arabia has announced a plan to go from about 60 percent reuse today to 65 percent. China is mandating water reuse for cites and for certain industries. So it’s kind of – I think – taking root globally.

John: Singapore 30. Like you say they punch way above their weight. They – as you shared on the last show – have a clear path for that number to even go up higher.

Jon: Absolutely. And, John, the reason is not just because the technology they’re using is different from what we can use here in California.

John: Right.

Jon: It’s not. It’s because they put policies in place that are driving more rapid and widespread adoption of these reuse technologies.

John: If that’s the case – a couple of points – you just said we’re trending higher than the world rate here in California.

Jon: Absolutely.

John: But lower than some of the better paradigms that are out there now – let’s just look at Israel and Singapore as two that we just discussed. So given that you are the policy person, you are Government Affairs and in charge of partnerships.

Jon: Right.

John: You are literally at the cross-section of where all the action is going to be happening in terms of taking the technologies that exist today – the technologies that GE has and other great companies and iconic brands like GE – and getting it into the hands of governments, municipalities, cities, countries to deploy, to create another Singapore situation, another Israel situation and not be down at 3 or 4 percent recycling and reuse. Is this correct?

Jon: Exactly. Exactly right. And you know today I just want to commend Mike Connors, the Deputy Secretary of the Department of Interior for the United States who is here at this event in San Francisco. Mike also used to be the Commissioner for the Bureau of Reclamation, which has responsibility for insuring adequate supplies of water in the 17 western states. Now the Bureau of Reclamation reports to him in his more elevated role. There is a lot of interest on seeing that the United States actually does reuse more water, and it starts in Washington and it filters down here to California, where by the way from a policy standpoint – you said from a technology standpoint California is ahead of the rest of the country, well, they are from a policy standpoint too. So we are absolutely on trajectory where I do think we will see much more reuse. And by the way, when more wastewater is being reused, you’ve effectively sustainably increased the supply of water forever.

John: I want to hear your vision, though. Since the technology exists, but it’s just all about getting that technology into the hands of the users and convincing them that it’s compelling and giving them a sense of urgency to deploy this, what’s your vision of bridging that gap in the years ahead, so we can get ahead of these problems instead of behind?

Jon: So I think there are some barriers to adoption of reuse technologies today otherwise you’d see it being used more broadly here in the U.S. like you see it in Singapore and Israel. If you ask me those barriers are things like concern about whether reused water is safe for things like agriculture and drinking water. It’s a lack of clear standards, so a lot of industries don’t know if they can treat wastewater and use it to do something like, for example, wash their chickens in a poultry processing plant. They don’t know because there aren’t clear standards in many cases telling them what is allowable. Then the third thing – and I think probably the biggest of all – is economics. In other words, it’s cheaper to take water from the ground or river or even a potable municipal system, where it’s almost universally underpriced, than it is to implement reuse technologies. So you have to address these barriers, and that’s where I think policy comes into play.

John: Let’s go back to, though, the first thing that you brought up. The first data point. Safety. Your membrane technology – that is a slam dunk, that is a layup now, the safety is there. The technology is there to make the water from grey to drinkable, from black to drinkable now.

Jon: That is absolutely correct, because it’s a physical barrier. You are physically separating the H20 molecules from the bad stuff.

John: So now it comes down to public/private partnerships working in conjunction to right-size the policies.

Jon: I think it’s waiting for water prices to move up – which they are – because as water prices move up then investing in reuse technologies is going to be more cost competitive. I think it’s seeing more communities doing education and outreach like San Diego is doing right now because San Diego is doing a pilot program for direct potable reuse, and as a part of that, they’re not just piloting the technology, they are doing extensive outreach to make sure the community is comfortable with this concept.

John: Got you. So is this part of your grand plan of putting together important conferences like today with the thought leaders that you’ve amassed in terms of further messaging this and getting this out as much as possible to the consumers out there?

Jon: We are absolutely committed to playing the role as a thought leader. We certainly want to be a convener to bring together people who make policies but also people who implement them, and there are a number of general managers of large wastewater agencies here today who are doing an absolutely stellar job. They’re on the frontlines of leading this kind of reuse revolution. There is a guy here named Mike Marcus who is the General Manager of Orange County Water District. He is treating 100 million gallons a day of wastewater and injecting it into the ground to replenish the groundwater supply. It’s the largest indirect potable reuse project in the world. So there are a lot of guys here who are doing incredible work and we’re trying to support their efforts and also help be a voice for policies that will help them reuse more water.

John: From a recycling perspective, Jon, in terms of recycling electronics, food, textiles, the national movement has sort of abdicated the role to cities right now, and we’ve seen that in our industry and I’ve seen that also in composting and with regards to textiles. When it comes to water, is more policy going to come out of D.C. on water that is going to then be pushed down and going to help effectuate change here in this country? Or is it going to come from the ground up from the great city leaders that we have like Rahm and like Nutter and De Blasio and Garcetti and the new generation of mayors and other city leaders that want sustainable cities, that want resilient cities? Which way is it going to come? Top down or bottom up or both?

Jon: It’s both because you have leaders like Mike Connor, who is here today – as I mentioned – from the Department of Interior. You have the U.S. EPA. You have other federal agencies involved who are leading because they’re using their bully pulpits but also they’re creating incentives to promote greater water reuse. You see that through the U.S. Bureau of Reclamations Title 16 incentive program. You see it through EPA’s Clean Water State Revolving Loan Funds which also go to wastewater agencies in part for water reuse. But you’re also seeing the real new regulations coming out at the state level because there is no federal regulation around water reuse. So states like California are actually leading the way.

John: Got you. With regards to, I love the story you shared with me in terms of how do you convince others to do the right thing and you shared with me the story of sometimes in your travels, or when you are trying to use a successful paradigm to show off, you actually bring some leadership from Singapore with you to specific regions of the world or meetings and things of that such. Can you share with our listeners and our viewers a little bit about how you use success stories to foster future success?

Jon: How do you remember this stuff? That’s great. So yeah, I’m happy to do that. Let me just start by saying, as part of our global sustainability initiative called Ecomagination, I also think we lead by example. We have a story to tell about what we did in GE that I think can be example for other companies as well. And you know, John, in terms of water just by virtue of setting a goal – we said, “Hey, we’re going to try to reduce our water consumption by 25 percent” – we have now reduced it by 45 percent.

John: Wow.

Jon: And absent this sustainability initiative, that never would have happened.

John: Right.

Jon: So I think there is more that we can all do individually, but also we do convene events in places around the world. We’ve done it in Shanghai. We did it in Riyadh. We did it in Crotonville, New York. We have the global training facility. And now here in San Francisco. And we have brought the director of water policy from Singapore because they are the world leader. We brought a professor of the water resources economics from Cal-Berkley to Saudi Arabia and we’ve brought the Executive Director of the Water Reuse Association to China. So the idea is to get these thought leaders out there who can truly share best practices in creating policies that will allow for a great reuse of water.

John: That’s awesome. Well, I’ll leave any last thoughts before I let you go back to the conference, which you are hosting today. Any last thoughts for our listeners or viewers out there on water, technology, innovation or the great brand – GE – that you represent in such fine fashion?

Jon: I would just say Green Is Good is the best show on radio, John. Thank you very much.

John: Oh that’s so nice of you. And again this is the IGEL Wharton GE edition of Green Is Good in downtown San Francisco. We’ve got Jon Freedman, who is also my friend. He is the Head of Global Partnerships and Governmental Affairs for GE, and to learn more about what GE Water is doing – and GE is doing – please go to www.GEwater.com. Jon Freedman, you are truly living proof that Green Is Good. Thank you so much for everything.

Jon: You are a great host.

Innovating Sustainability Solutions with Dr. Ana Pinheiro Privette

Dr. Ana Pinheiro Privette is the Head of Sustainability for AWS Impact Computing, and the Global Lead for ASDI. Prior to joining Amazon, she led projects for the White House climate portfolio, including the Obama Climate Data Initiative (CDI) and the Partnership for Resilience and Preparedness (PREP), and worked as a scientist at NASA and NOAA.

John Shegerian: Hey, friendly listener! Are you enjoying the Impact Podcast? Then give us a thumbs up and leave a five-star review on iTunes, Spotify, Google Play, or wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts.

John: This edition of the Impact Podcast is brought to you by ERI. ERI has a mission to protect people, the planet, and your privacy, and is the largest fully integrated IT and electronics asset disposition provider and cybersecurity-focused hardware destruction company in the United States, and maybe even the world. For more information on how ERI can help your business properly dispose of outdated electronic hardware devices, please visit eridirect.com.

John: Welcome to another edition of the Impact Podcast. I’m John Shegerian. We’re so lucky to have with us today Dr. Ana Pinheiro Privette. Welcome to the Impact Podcast, Dr. Privette, Ana.

Dr. Ana Pinheiro Privette: Thank you. Thank you for having me.

John: Of course. You are the Head of Sustainability for AWS Impact Computing and the Global Lead for ASDI. Before we get talking about your important role at Amazon and what you’re doing there, let’s first talk about Ana and your background. Where did you grow up, and how did you even get here?

Ana: Sure. Okay. So it starts on the other side of the Atlantic. I grew up in Portugal…

John: Wow.

Ana: …on the North Coast, and moved to Lisbon for college, and then eventually made it to the U.S. for graduate school. The plan was not to stay. I’d planned to go back, but here I am. I’m one of those cases. I’ve been around for 25 years in the U.S.

John: There’s a common thread in your life when I’ve read your biography in terms of working in and around the White House climate portfolio and other things. You’ve been working in sustainability for most of your career. Can you share with our listeners and viewers what have you been doing during most of your career before you made it over to be the Global Lead for ASDI?

Ana: Yes. I spent a big chunk of my career as a researcher. I went through graduate school, Ph.D., and then end up spending a lot of time at NASA, and then later at NOAA doing work… My work was focused on how to use satellites to measure the temperature of the earth and end up doing a lot of fieldwork in Africa to validate the NASA satellites and other efforts. But my interest has always been in how data and knowledge can help us make decisions. So although I learned a lot when I was more in the theoretical space, my goal has been… All my life, I’m trying to come to the side of the applied side of data and the applied side of science. That’s eventually how I got to the White House and very focused on their portfolio, their climate portfolio, to open access to the federal data to support climate action. Now, Amazon for the last 5 years, trying to take that step further in the democratization of data.

John: Wow. All right. Well, let’s get talking about what you’re doing actually at ASDI. ASDI, for our listeners and viewers, is Amazon Sustainability Data Initiative. What is going on it? What does that mean? What’s your real mission there?

Ana: Yes, so what we see across the space of sustainability, and also really honestly, very based on my experience as the researcher, is that anything we’re trying to do in the space of sustainability… And we talk about sustainability very broadly, like thinking of the Sustainable Development Goals from the United Nations which is anything from food security, water availability, and climate action. Think of the entire space, everything we do in this space requires data and it’s just critical. Because we need to understand where are we now. What’s the baseline? But also how well are we doing, progressing towards our goals? The decreasing temperature of the planet or having more water available. Things like that. So, there is a core and we have more data than ever before. We went from having little data in the old days and now we have more satellites in space than ever before. Models generate higher, larger amounts of data and so… But that’s not necessarily translating into an easier way for people to make decisions because suddenly you have all this data dispersed everywhere. It is gigantic, so large that some of the data sets we work with in the climate space are terabytes and petabytes in size. Maybe that doesn’t mean much for people but just imagine 500,000 movies kind of thing. And so if you are trying to access the data and extract knowledge from it, what we see is that in practice only a few around the world can do that, only those that have access to the storage for the data. And then the computer on top of the data can extract the knowledge. And there’s an issue of democratization here. So what we’re trying to do with ASDI is to understand how the cloud can play a role in this process of really opening access to this data to anybody in the world independent of where they are and the resources that they have right now.

John: Did this exist before you and Amazon created it? Or are you following another paradigm? Or is this white space in front of you and you’re the first to democratize this amount of data?

Ana: We started, we launched the program almost 5 years ago. I came to join Amazon just 5 years ago to start this process and it was very much focused on, one, the fact that the federal agencies and the work I’ve been doing before were focused on, “Let’s even identify what’s available. Let’s go across all the federal agencies that are touching anything related to climate…

John: Right.

Ana: …and make an inventory and make that public. So people can go and find the data. Although that was very foundational, one of the things that were not fully helping the democratization is that once you find where the data is, like, for instance, that NOAA or a NASA data server, you still have to get the data and bring it somewhere to work with it, right?

John: Right.

Ana: So that effort is being repeated over and over again. So what we call an AWS, is the undifferentiated heavy lifting, which means everybody is going, finding the data, acquiring it, storing it, cleaning it, and only after that, they produce knowledge. And that’s accounted for about 80% of the effort. It means that we’re all doing 80% of the effort that is redundant, and only after that, we are creating knowledge. So it seems logical, stepping back from all of that, that we remove that layer of work that we’re all doing. Do it once or twice or whatever many times as needed, and then allow people to come and build on top of it. So that’s what we thought with this program, and with the fact that we have this amazing tool, the cloud, which is virtually accessible from anywhere that you have access to the internet. You don’t have to have all that computing and all the storage. Amazon is doing that, and then you just come and build on top of it. So, yeah.

John: So you’re getting rid of that 80% waste of time and redundancy, so people could go back to the real learning part, the real creation[?] part.

Ana: So that’s I hope that– And we hope that that will catalyze innovation because we are removing all those barriers and make it much cheaper and easier for people to experiment because now they don’t have to go through all that process. They can easily go on top of the data experiment and create new solutions and new products and new knowledge.

John: Is that what you mean by the recent announcement of the AWS Data Exchange? What’s the whole purpose of the data exchange?

Ana: So the data exchange, that’s an additional layer that we created to help customers. So the AWS Data Exchange is just really a marketplace for data, and traditionally, it’s been very focused on data, that is license data. Like if you are a company, you created a product that is relevant to sustainability, you want to sell it, you can sell it through that marketplace. But if you wanted to go and get the free data, like the open data that we expose through ASDI, you would have to go to a different place. And so when we looked at it, we thought, “Oh, that doesn’t make sense for the customer to have to know where to go to get data and go to two different places. So let’s integrate those two catalogs.” So now, the open free data is discoverable in the same catalog as the license pay data. So you can find everything in the same space.

John: Wow, God. Can you give a couple of use cases of how really what you’re doing is making the world a better and more sustainable place?

Ana: Yes, and honestly, that’s the part that is exciting for us, at least for me, and because we talk about democratizing data and it’s great. And you open all this data. But then really what’s relevant is the impact that this is creating. What we see is that, as I was saying before, you remove this barrier and it makes it so much easier for people to work on top of the data and create new products and solutions, that they are building this ecosystem for sustainability. And we work across the entire space. So we work as much with NGOs and governments as we do with Academia and nonprofits. One thing that I forgot to mention before that is important here is that we believe that once you put the data in the cloud, that’s the first step, but now we have all this data there. But if you want to extract knowledge, you need to compute. You need to analyze the data. There’s a cost associated with that. AWS is a free tier, but if you want to do heavy computation or build a product, you would need some computes. And we want to offset that cost. So we have a cloud-run program that ASDI runs where anybody, really literally anybody, can apply. There’s an ongoing call for proposals, so you can apply any time for a grant to work for free in the cloud for one year, and there’s no cap. So as long as you can justify it and we accept you into the program, we subsidize for you to work in the cloud for one year, and we have subsidized- basically, sponsor startups and groups all over the space. That’s the exciting part to see, is when you put the data and the computer together. We have tons of startups that are doing work in improving precision agriculture in Africa, in India, and all over the world, or works that are creating products for the solar industry, like forecasts for solar radiation, or… I can go through the list, we have a huge amount of groups doing different work.

John: So let’s go back. So you talk about great federal agencies such as NOAA and NASA being users of your data, scientists, federal governments, and local governments. What about big business? Am I missing something? Does the big business have the same access? Or how is big business treated about your democratized data set?

Ana: Anybody, so really literally anybody. That’s part of this belief that we have, that it takes everybody at the table to solve these huge problems, and everybody will contribute differently. So if you are a corporation and you find value in the data that we’re making available, you can go and use it, and you can even monetize on top of it. It’s completely open. And the model of the data- So we don’t touch the data ourselves, just to make that clear, and that’s part of our process as well. If we identify a data set that is relevant for this space, for instance, let’s say there’s a data set from NOAA, we would go to NOAA and say, “NOAA, we would like to ask you to host that data set in the cloud or the customers or the community asking for that.” So, we’re going to cover all the costs for the data to be stored in the cloud and all the egress costs. So if people want to take it out and download it, we cover all those costs. You don’t even need to have an AWS account to be able to access the data and take it. But you need to commit that if we pay for all of this you need to make it publicly available and distribute it to anybody in the world. And so that’s part of that process of democratization. What this ensures is that the data from NOAA that is served on AWS is NOAA data. NOAA owns the bucket. NOAA distributes the data; they maintain it. We are an enabling platform to distribute it. And so we have all these data sets from what we call authoritative data providers around the world that own those different data sets. We are just making it, creating the conditions for that to become public.

John: How fast is that group growing, the known data set group?

Ana: We have now terabytes and petabytes. I think we have over 100, we have 149, 150 data sets right now, and many, many petabytes of data. They are all open and open licenses so people can… Some of them have some… not restrictions, but they would have recommendations if you want to-1 your kit[?], use it commercially because they might not be. They might be more experimental, something like that, but that’s

all very clear and transparent in each data set.

John: But what I really would be interested in hearing is…

Ana: Oh.

John: No, that’s fascinating, but do you have people underneath you doing outreach to continue to grow that? Or is the incoming outreach to join it much larger? Or it is both two ways?

Ana: It goes both ways. So we are open, always open to our customers to tell us and the community what they need. And when we hear that, we would go and say, “Hey, is–” Data provider. We really would like to have this data set, and at the same time we have data providers come to us, and say, “We would love to make this data set more available.” Because it helps them. It diminishes the requirements on their servers and system. It creates more visibility to the data set and it creates more impact. So it’s good for everybody.

John: How about the application process for those who want to use it and get your one-year scholarship? How big is that group growing? How do people find out about ASDI?

Ana: So, it’s all on our web page. If you go to amazonsdi.com… At the bottom of the page, there’s a clear link if you want to apply for– we call it Promotional Credit. And that’s a growing number as well, but what we’ve done is that to scale, we have this ongoing call for proposals, but we also create collaborations with different groups around the world that we name as boundary organizations, like, for instance, the group on Earth Observations. It’s an intergovernmental group seated in Geneva under the World Meteorological Organization. They have hundreds of member countries, a lot of them from developing countries. And so, for instance, we created a collaboration with them where we said, “We’ll commit 1.5 million dollars in credits, you go and ask from your developing countries which ones would like to work in the clouds for 3 years in climate-related problems. And we’ll fund and we’ll work collaboratively and support you in that process.” So that way we also have people that are like, “You didn’t find the right people for us to fund and support and the right issues.”

John: Got it, got it. So now you’ve been there for 5 years in ASDI. Sounds like it’s gone to a very good place so far. How do you take it to the next level? What’s your vision for the next 5 years?

Ana: Yes. Okay. So, there’s the glamorous part and the not-glamorous part.

John: Like everything else in life, by the way.

Ana: Because one of the things that we’ve learned through these 5 years of experience and working with the customers and the communities is that to fully democratize the data, you need to go beyond opening it. So one thing is to say, “Here’s all the data is open, come and use it, take it.” Another thing is to allow people to use it effectively and that process involves, in some cases, doing things like changing the format of the data. Because, for instance, if you have a TAR file, that is compressed and you put it in the cloud, to use it you have to take it out of the cloud. So these are the things that are not glamorous, but that we need to put a lot of investment and time into working with the community and the data providers to ensure that when the data makes it to the cloud, is in a way that it’s easily consumable in a cloud environment. So that’s a lot of the less glamorous but foundational works that we need to do to make the data even more usable, especially by those people that are not power users. The ones that are not as comfortable using the cloud.

John: Right.

Ana: And then we’re always looking for opportunities to extend the space and the impact, and one of the areas we’ve been focusing very strongly recently is building capacities in those less– the underserved communities that have less traditional access to compute and resources. So we are doing a lot of work in bringing climate models to the cloud, showing that this can be a way to democratize the climate science’s[?] space as well. I’m very excited about that. And some collaborations we have with NCAR and Silver Lining and other groups out there.

John: Got it, got it. Talk about sustainability as a priority just for AWS overall, AWS and even take it as far as Amazon.

Ana: Yes, so sustainability is a top focus for what we’re doing across Amazon, and you’re probably familiar with the Climate Pledge. I don’t know how many of the listeners will be as well but then…

John: [inaudible] Climate Pledge, it’s important.

Ana: Yes. So, it is in the sense that it… It’s ingrained into everything we’re doing these days inside Amazon. In 2019, Amazon launched, in partnership with Global Optimism, this pledge called the Climate Pledge to go carbon-neutral by 2040, which for a company like Amazon as you can imagine is a major commitment because it means that we have to turn upside down all of our operations and all of our infrastructure to remove carbon from it. That transforms the way we are doing things internally and there’s a lot of innovation that is happening internally, needing a lot of data which also speaks to what we’re trying to do with this process of ASDI, of opening access to data because everybody will need it.

John: Right.

Ana: But because of that, we also recognize that although we’re doing a lot of innovation internally, we can play an enablement role with our cloud to help innovation happening on the outside. And that’s how ASDI fits into this story. We have this cloud, it’s a very powerful tool. How can we make it easier for other people out there to innovate and build this space collectively? And that’s how this all comes together.

John: Got it, got it, got it. So, from AWS’s perspective, what’s next? What’s next for AWS?

Ana: So, AWS is focused on its internal work. How do we make our data centers more sustainable? That means, I know, making our processes more efficient, building new hardware, new processors that [inaudible] everywhere[?] efficiency for the same amount of processing done, using renewables, all of those things internally. But then there’s the other layer which is how we help our customers in their sustainability journey, right?

John: Right.

Ana: And that means things like you can write your code in your workloads in very different ways, and some ways are more energy efficient and have a lower carbon footprint, and others do not. So we have a new pillar in our well-architectured guidelines, focusing on sustainability that will help the customers create solutions that are more sustainable and consume less energy. That’s very exciting actually.

John: When do you do that part of the education? How is that education done with your clients, and how is that part of the interaction happen actually?

Ana: Actually, we incorporate that very strongly in the U.S., yeah. If you apply for a grant and it’s above a certain amount, we say, “Okay, we’ll give you the money but you have to have your plan, and your architecture reviewed by this particular team that is specialized in this kind of expertise. And they need to look at your code and make sure that you are and your workload- and make sure that it is optimized for energy efficiency and the carbon footprint. And so they will recommend changes to your workloads.” And I think, our perspective, everybody wins, the planet wins, and the customer wins. Because once that one year is over, if they want to continue doing the work, they have it optimized. The less energy consumption and fewer cycles, the less money. So I’ve made it [crosstalk] [inaudible] for everybody.

John: That’s fascinating, Ana. I’ve never heard anywhere that the code could be written to be more sustainable. That’s fascinating.

Ana: It’s impactful when we’re trying… talking about, like, for instance, weather and climate modeling which is like a gigantic footprint and amount of work. So we have to do all this work to improve our knowledge of the climate, but at the same time, we are generating cycles and consuming energy, and creating a carbon footprint. So we need to do it the right way to do it.

John: I love it. And again, the website for people to find you and your colleagues is aws.amazon.com.

Ana: The ASDI one would be amazonsdi.com.

John: Oh, amazonasdi.com.

Ana: amazonsdi, so Amazon Sustainability Data Initiative.

John: Okay, amazonsdi.com.

Ana: So, amazonsdi.com. Yes.

John: Okay. Got it, got it, got it. Perfect. Any last things you want to say before we sign off and say goodbye just for today? Are there any last thoughts that you like to share with our listeners and our viewers today, Ana?

Ana: Well, a call to action. If you have amazing data that can benefit the broader world[?] in this space, please reach out and consider hosting your data in the cloud. And if you have an amazing idea of how to use open data and build a solution, they can help build this space. We would love to hear from you as well. And thank you for the opportunity to share the word.

John: Ana, thank you so much for not only what you but Amazon and ASDI are doing, you not only make the world a more sustainable but a better place. The impacts that you’re making are felt every day. And we’re just– thank you for all the great work you’re doing. Thank you again.

Ana: Thank you very much.

John: This episode of the Impact Podcast is brought to you by Closed Loop Partners. Closed Loop Partners is a leading circular economy investor in the United States with an extensive network of Fortune 500 corporate investors, family offices, institutional investors, industry experts, and impact partners. Closed Loop’s platform spans the arc of capital from venture capital to private equity, bridging gaps and fostering synergies to scale the circular economy. To find Closed Loop Partners, please go to www.closedlooppartners.com.

The Trend Toward Solar Energy with Allan Drury

Allan Drury joined Con Edison in May 2009 as a Media Relations spokesman. Working in New York City, the media capital of the world, he speaks daily with reporters from local and national newspapers, television and radio stations, trade magazines and digital publications on behalf of a company that provides electric, gas and steam to 3.4 million customers. Con Edison has been cited for its environmental commitment by Newsweek magazine, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Energy and other organizations. Drury’s areas of coverage include distributed generation, energy infrastructure, energy efficiency, regulatory matters and safety.

John Shegerian: Get the latest impact episodes right now in your inbox each week. Subscribe by entering your email at impactpodcast.com to make sure you never miss an interview. This edition of the Impact Podcast is brought to you by ERI. ERI has a mission to protect people, the planet, and your privacy, and is the largest fully-integrated IT and electronics asset disposition provider and cybersecurity-focused hardware destruction company in the United States, and maybe even the world. For more information on how ERI can help your business properly dispose of outdated electronic hardware devices, please visit ERIdirect.com.

John: Hi. This is John Shegerian. I never could have imagined when we started the Green is Good radio show back in 2006 that it would grow into a big podcast called the Green is Good Podcast. And now, we’ve evolved that podcast to the Impact Podcast, which is more inclusive and more diverse than ever before. But we did look back recently at some of our timeless Green is Good interviews and decided to share some of them with you now. So, enjoy one of our great Green is Good episodes from our archives. And next week, I’ll be back with a fresh and new episode of the Impact Podcast. Thanks again for listening. I’m grateful to all of you. This is John Shegerian.

John: Welcome to another edition of Green is Good. Today, we’re so honored to have with us Allan Dury. He’s the spokesperson for Con Edison. Welcome to Green is Good, Allan.

Allan Dury: Thanks for having me. Glad to be in.

John: Hey, happy to have you. Before we get talking about all the green things that Con Edison is up to, Allan, can you share a little bit about your journey, leading up to this position at Con Edison? What got you interested in sustainability in the environment and doing something really good that helps the world be a better place?

Allan: I was a newspaper reporter for a lot of years. My last job was here in this area as a business reporter, and wrote a lot about energy and clean energy and so forth. So, I guess I always had the interest in that I came here to Con Edison in May of 2009 and haven’t had a bad day since.

John: That’s wonderful. So now, basically, you’re the person that when people need answers about what Con Edison is doing with regards to all their greening efforts and environmental efforts, you’re the person they come to. We’re so excited to have you on today. Can you talk to us a little bit about the history? Now, I’m a native New Yorker, so I grew up, and Con Edison was such an iconic brand. But we have listeners not only around the United States but around the world, Allan. Can you share a little bit of the Con Edison history and its richness and what it’s done for the City of New York and its citizens since its inception?

Allan: Yeah. I, first of all, should make it clear that I’m not “the person” that provides information. I’m one of eight colleagues that do a great job. It kind of started as a gas company back in the 1800s, and then Thomas Edison built the first generating station down on Pearl Street in Lower Manhattan in the early 1880s. What’s brought up was a lot of electric gas companies throughout the years. And that’s where the name Consolidated Edison comes from. These companies were consolidated into one company, and that’s the company we have today. We provide electricity, gas, and steam in the five boroughs of New York City and Westchester County, Westchester County being the county just north of New York City. We have 3.4 million electric customers. We have 1.1 million gas customers in Manhattan, the Bronx, Westchester, and a portion of Queens. So, there are no gas customers in Staten Island or Brooklyn, and only in part of Queens. Now, we have 1,800 steam customers as well. Those are in Manhattan. And those steam customers, they run from The Battery, which is at the southern tip of Manhattan up to 96th Street. And though there’s not a lot of them, they tend to be big customers, the Empire State Building, Grand Central Station, United States Rockefeller Center, some of the big hospitals. Steam is a big part of the business, too.

John: Wow. So many forms of energy that you guys provide to [crosstalk] keep New York–

Allan: Yeah. We provide that energy in the nation’s largest metropolitan area. It’s the most densely populated city. New York, of course, is the world’s financial capital, and it’s home to some of the world’s greatest universities and hospitals and research labs. It truly is a 24/7 city, so that means our business has to be 24/7. It’s quite a responsibility to keep power flowing reliably. We’re confident and we’re proud that we think we do that well.

John: And, Allan, since energy is so much part of our discussions now, every time you turn on the news or pick up a newspaper or listen to politicians speak, whether it’s about climate change or energy conservation or energy preservation or making better energy grids, can you share a little bit about the evolution of Con Edison and its thought process and its involvement with the environment, some stuff that maybe we’re not thinking of that Con Edison has been doing and making part of their culture and DNA for previous years and what they’re doing now with regards to the environment?

Allan: Yeah. I think Con Edison has been[?] for years before its time when it comes to conservation and saving energy as far back as the early 1970s, I guess. There’s a program called Save A Lot, encouraging energy efficiency. At that time, the company was in the generation business. We generated electricity, whereas now, we’re more or less out of the generation business, just transmission and distribution, very little generation. Some folks might be surprised that a utility place has such great emphasis on protecting the environment, but we’re actually very proud of our environmental stewardship. Newsweek magazine named us the greenest utility in the United States and one of the greenest companies overall. We’ve actually reduced our greenhouse gas emissions 43% since 2005, so that’s pretty impressive. We recycled about 90% of our non-hazardous waste. Just last year, we completed gas additions to steam stations. That was a big project. The stations served Manhattan. Those additions avoid about 140,000 tons of CO2 emissions a year. We have Green Dot fleet of vehicles. We have vehicles that run on biodiesel fuel, and we’re expanding a number of hybrid and alternative fuel vehicles in our fleet. Currently, about half our vehicle fleet is running on some form of alternative fuel of high-efficiency energy. We’ve also stepped up our efforts to replace priority piping on our gas system, Elite Pro piping, that helps reduce methane emissions. We spend an average of $250 million a year for three years. That’s 2014, 2015, and 2016, replacing cast iron and unprotected steel name[?]. We replaced an average of 65 miles of priority pipe segments in these three years. That’s nearly doubled from just a few years ago. And, of course, we work with customers to help them use less energy.

John: Well, I want to talk about that. I just want to give a shout-out for our listeners just joining us. We’ve got Allan Dury on. He’s one of the spokespeople from Con Edison, and we’re talking about energy conservation and sustainability. For those who want to learn more about all the great work that Con Edison does, please go to www.ConEd.com. I’m on your site right now. First of all, I got to tell you something. It is actually very impressive and very green site. There’s a link here that you could download the sustainability report for Con Ed. There’s so many great factoids and information here. It’s really, really impressive. Let’s go back to what you just were raising when I diverted. Talk about, Allan, please, how does Con Ed help customers use less energy?

Allan: We always say that we’re a bit unusual as a business because we encourage our customers to use less, not more–

John: –of what you’re selling. Less of what you’re selling!

Allan: Yeah, less of our products and services. Not only do we encourage them to do that, but we try to help them do that. And we’ll even pay them to make energy-efficient upgrades. We have programs for residential customers, small business customers [crosstalk]

John: Explain some of them. Explain some of the better programs that are out there, the more popular ones with residents and with businesses.

Allan: Okay. We’ve had a lot of success the last few Summers with smart thermostats that allow customers to control their air conditioning setting remotely. If a customer gets to work, realizes that they didn’t shut down their air conditioning – they don’t want it running all day while they’re at work because that would be wasteful – they can shut it down. We’ve paid out about $190 million in incentives to more than 217,000 customers who have made upgrades. The upgrades can be lighting, HVAC systems, just a whole range of programs that we have. We have [crosstalk] customer, you know?

John: Which is the most popular for businesses? Is it the lighting program for businesses for energy efficiency?

Allan: I would say it’s more popular. They’re all pretty popular across the board. There’s something there for everybody. And the great thing about our programs is that you don’t have to be an engineer or an energy expert to take advantage of them. Something as simple as changing lighting, it’s easy to do and it will save you energy and money.

John: You know, Allan, at the top of the show, you mentioned the amazing coverage that Con Edison does throughout the burrows and throughout Manhattan. I’m a Queens boy. Can you share a little bit about what’s going on with regards to your push into Brooklyn and Queens right now, and what’s your future plans there?

Allan: Yeah, sure. We’re seeing a lot of economic growth in portions of Brooklyn and Queens. That growth is both residential and commercial. Naturally, that spawns a greater need for energy. We think that that need will reach capacity within a few years. The areas we’re talking about here are North, Central, and Eastern Brooklyn, and Southwest Queens. I think it’s the best way to characterize it. Traditionally, the utility solution here, of course, would be to build more stuff, more power lines, install transformers, a substation. What we’re trying to do is work with customers in these neighborhoods on alternative ways to provide them with the lighting, and the heating, and the cooling they need but with less energy consumption. We think that if we do this successfully, we can defer the construction of a billion-dollar substation, and that’s good across for customers because our operations are funded by ratepayers. So if we can defer the construction of a billion-dollar substation, that’s deferring that cost on behalf of our ratepayers. We’re offering add-ons[?] to our existing incentive programs to help customers manage the energy usage in these areas. If this program is successful, we’ll use it in other areas where the demand for electricity is growing.

John: That makes a lot of sense. Talk a little bit– with amazing and the great growth and explosion of exciting brands like Solar City, can you share a little bit about what’s Con Edison’s approach towards the trend of using more solar energy?

Allan: Yeah. Again, some people might see this as a bit of a mystery company that makes money by bringing electricity to people’s homes and businesses, encouraging customers to see whether its worthwhile for them to generate their own electricity [crosstalk] solar panels on their roofs. That’s what we’ve done and continued to do. Customers have responded. Our customers have completed about 3,500 solo projects in New York City in Westchester County, and those projects produce about 55 megawatts of clean renewable energy. Now, to a layperson, how much is 55 megawatts? That may not speak to a layperson, but that’s a lot of energy. I can tell you it’s more than enough to meet the peak needs of one World Trade Center, 30 Rock, the Empire State Building, Madison Square Garden, New York Stock Exchange, Yankee Stadium, and Citi Field, which is where the Mets play. So it’s a lot of energy. With the incentives and the tax breaks that are available, and of course, the savings that you can get in electricity, a customer can get a pretty quick payback on an investment in a solar array. And we’ve even placed solar panels on our headquarters building here in Manhattan. We have 200 high-efficiency panels that produce about 40 kilowatts of quick renewable power. Con Edison Development, which is a competitive energy business, is now the sixth-largest solar owner in the United States. We’ve come long ways with solar energy and our customers have, too.

John: That is awesome. There are also regulations requiring buildings in New York to switch over from oil to natural gas. Can you explain how that transition’s going and the switchover’s going, and what role does Con Edison play in that transition?

Allan: Yeah. We have a big role there. Under former Mayor Michael Bloomberg, I believe it was 2011, the city passed regulations that require buildings to get off number 6 fuel oil by 2015 and number 4 fuel oil by 2030. Those are two very heavy, dirty fuel oils, a lot of emissions. So, the past three years or so, we’ve converted more than 2,200 large New York City buildings from number 4 and 6 oil. What’s interesting here is that customers are also converting from what’s called number 2 fuel oil even though that’s not required by the regulation. We’ve converted more than 1,400 large New York City buildings from number 2 fuel oil. And these customers are converting because natural gas is less expensive than oil, and the US Energy Information Administration projects that it’s going to remain less expensive for the foreseeable future. We think our new gas customers have eliminated about 150 tons a year of fine particulate matter from the atmosphere. So, that’s been a very good program, as well.

John: How long does that process take to get buildings to make that switchover? How complicated is that? Obviously, I’m not a technically-oriented person when it comes to major infrastructural transitions like that, but how complicated is it to take a large commercial building in midtown Manhattan and switch it from oil to gas?

Allan: Obviously, there’s a lot of work that needs to be done, a lot of engineering, a lot of construction. It’s a significant job, but we’ve had a lot of success with it. We continue convertible [inaudible]. It will surpass last year’s numbers in 2014 for conversions, so it’s going along quite well.

John: Something that I read about a lot in the media is this trend towards white and green roofs. Can you share with our listeners, what does the white and green roofs really mean? And what is Con Edison’s thoughts to the effectiveness of the trend towards white and green roofs?

Allan: We’ve got a lead supporter of the City of New York’s CoolRoofs program for several years now. In fact, we have white roofs on many of our own facilities, substations and other buildings. In fact, the headquarters building that I’m in right now in Manhattan has white roofs, white membranes on many of the roofs. We also have a green roof and an experimental white roof on our training facility out in Long Island City, Queens. That training facility is a place where employees go for classroom learning and also field well learning as well. We’ve had scientists from Columbia University conduct research on the green roof, the white roof, and the traditional dark roof on that facility, and they’ve made some important findings. They’ve concluded that the white and green roofs keep the building cooler during the summer, [crosstalk] heat, and that cuts the air conditioning costs. You don’t need to crank your air conditioning as much to cool the building if you have these CoolRoofs.

John: Is there a percentage of cost that it cuts? Is it 10? Is it 20? Do we have some sort of hard evidence?

Allan: [crosstalk] a lot of other variables. [crosstalk] put out a report which I can get to you that lays some of that out. The whole concept is, you may remember when you were a kid, your mother or your father may have told you, “Hey, it’s a hot and sunny day out. Don’t wear a dark shirt [inaudible] the playground or go down to play basketball. It’ll absorb heat.” So, same concept here. What these traditionally dark roofs do is they collect heat during the day. And at night, they radiate it back into the atmosphere. So, that’s why the urban area temperatures are often warmer than suburban area temperatures, significantly warmer at night. Because if you think about what you have in the city, you have a lot of asphalt roadway and a lot of dark roofs, so they’re radiating heat back into the atmosphere at night. We have less of that out in the suburbs. If you can [crosstalk] whiten some of your roofs, then you’re not going to have that radiation of heat taking place at night.

John: When we were kids in New York, the black roofs, we used to call them Tar Beach.

Allan: Yeah. Right.

John: Right? It was the Tar Beach. But now, it’s white and green. Does the green have the same effect as the white, or is the white the real standard right now and green is part of it a little bit?

Allan: They’re both very effective. Green roofs, obviously, with a lot of plantings are going to take more maintenance, maintaining the plantings. It’s probably more expensive to maintain the plantings, but they’re both effective. And the other thing that a green roof will do is it will hold water. If you a get big rainstorm, they’ll hold water and that can help prevent what’s called combined sewage overflow. A lot of the water will stay up in that roof rather than go down into the sewer system and cause these nasty overflows. That’s the other nice function that green roofs have.

John: Right. You know, we’re down to the last minute and a half or so, Allan. Can you share future thought… the trends that Con Edison is going to be involved with on the future of energy efficiency? What does the future hold for the years ahead for your great company?

Allan: Well, I think it’s clear utility customers want and need more choices. They want distributed generation, energy efficiency, demand response, clean energy options, they want more resiliency, and the ability to be powered back up again quickly after a storm. They want the ability to better manage their energy usage. The New York State Public Service Commission, which is our regulator, recognizes this thought of getting called reforming energy vision. It could change the way electricity is delivered and consumed in the State in recognition of these trends.

John: Well, thank you so much, Allan Dury. We really appreciate your time today. To learn more about all the great things that Con Edison is doing when it comes to energy efficiency that can help our environment, please go to www.ConEd.com. Allan, thank you for shedding light on the important issues that Con Edison is working on to make the world a better place. You are truly living proof that green is good.

John: This episode of the Impact Podcast is brought to you by Closed Loop Partners. Closed Loop Partners is a leading circular economy investor in the United States with an extensive network of Fortune 500 corporate investors, family offices, institutional investors, industry experts, and Impact partners. Closed Loop’s platform spans the arc of capital from venture capital to private equity, bridging gaps and fostering synergies to scale the circular economy. To find Closed Loop Partners, please go to www.ClosedLoopPartners.com.

Innovating for a Sustainable Fashion Future with Tanya Brinich

Tanya is Senior Director of Resale-as-a-Service (RaaS) Client Success at thredUP. She is responsible for building and growing scalable resale experiences for thredUP’s RaaS brand partners – from Clean Out loyalty programs to white-label resale shops. Tanya is a seasoned ecommerce strategy and client success leader focused on sustainability and new business models that bring value to both consumers and brands. Prior to joining thredUP, Tanya held positions at Gap Inc., Ingenuity Foods, Kearney and Clean Currents.

John Shegerian: Get the latest Impact episodes right now in your inbox each week. Subscribe by entering your email at impactpodcast.com to make sure you never miss an interview. This edition of the Impact Podcast is brought to you by ERI. ERI has a mission to protect people, the planet, and your privacy. It’s the largest fully integrated IT and electronics asset disposition provider and cybersecurity-focused hardware destruction company in the United States and maybe even the world. For more information on how ERI can help your business properly dispose of outdated electronic hardware devices, please visit eridirect.com.

John: Welcome to another edition of the Impact Podcast! I’m John Shegerian. We have with us today, Tanya Brinich. She’s the Senior Director of Resale-as-a-Service for thredUP. Welcome, Tanya, to the Impact Podcast!

Tanya Brinich: Hi, John. Thanks for having me.

John: Hey, listen. Tanya, I know we’re not sitting together today. You’re in Oakland and I’m in Fresno, but we do have a special shoutout to our common friend, Judy Adler, for putting us together to make this show possible. Thank you, Judy, for making this great introduction. I’m so grateful to you and so grateful that we have Tanya, you on the show today. Before we get talking about this very important topic of clothes and being repurposed, and garment repurposing, can we first hear a little bit from you, Tanya, on your back story on how you even got here? What was your journey like? Where did you grow up?

Tanya: Yes. Absolutely. Okay. Let’s see. Where did I grow up? I grew up in Maryland. I was born in Russia. My parents moved here when I was five. We just kind of like transplanted to the U.S. I grew up in Maryland, and started with a very kind of like modest upbringing I would say. Also, just coming from a communist country, this relationship with shopping has always been really important to me. I remember just going to a store when we first came and being amazed at all of the things, like all of the different kinds of toothpaste, all the different colors of clothing. Going to the mall was like a big deal. Every trip to the mall was a big deal growing up. I think that kind of like informs maybe some of my relationship with consumerism. That has been a thread through my career and my upbringing as well. I didn’t really know what I wanted to do growing up. I knew international relations was important to me, just sort of like the policy aspect of things. I was interested in politics. That’s what I studied in undergrad. I studied International Relations in Hudson International Experience. Then, in the second year of my M.A. program, which I tacked on to my Bachelor’s, it was a policy-focused Master’s. I started trying to understand the impact on the environment and energy issues. I started realizing that when I thought I was going into the public sector and work for a non-profit or work for the U.S. government and make an impact on the environment and energy through that lens, the private sector was doing things much faster and on a bigger scale than the public sector was. I went to work for this clean energy startup called Clean Currents in the D.C. area. It was the most amazing foundational career experience that I could have ever asked for. I can go into a lot of that, but basically, it just kind of solidified my belief that the private sector was the place to be. I felt very energized by the phase of the work and the impact that I was having on the company and the industry at the time, and that really like launched me on this path to finding the intersection of impact and business.

John: I love it. Now, you’re at thredUP. How long have you been there?

Tanya: I’ve been at thredUP actually only six months now. I joined back in April. I came from Gap Inc. That is how I know Judy.

John: Okay. That also gave you a garment background as well.

Tanya: Yes, absolutely.

John: When you’re making that decision going to the wide, I’m sure you have a lot of opportunities in front of you and had options and things of that such, why thredUP?

Tanya: Yes. It’s a great question. I would say like maybe I’ll start with “Why Gap?” I came to Gap because of its sustainability mission. That was when I was so energized and excited to learn about. I still think Gap is doing such amazing things. I think like, for me, ultimately, I was noticing in my own behavior that I was just not feeling great about buying new clothes as much as I love fashion. I love new clothing. I personally try to shift my behavior to do more second-hand shopping. I knew about thredUP for a long time. When this kind of opportunity working with brands in this capacity came across, I was like, “Wow!” This is such an amazing mash of the things I love — brand, fashion, and sustainability, all in one place. Then, honestly, what sealed the deal for me was the conversation with our CEO James Reinhart. He was just super transparent with me about the kind of trade-offs that we have to make from a sustainability angle. There’s not a perfect solution. We’re an e-commerce company, fundamentally. We’re still using plastics to ship packages. Just like the realism with which he took this kind of approach of like we’re trying to make the biggest impact, but there’s no silver bullet. I think he’s a very thoughtful person and he kind of sealed the deal for me as to why this is the best next step for me.

John: You know, before you came on, when I was reading about you and thredUP, I was so excited about the show because, A, I know it’s about a big problem. We’re going to get into that in a second. But B, it’s sort of like a full circle for myself. Because now, I started college at NYU in 1980. Back then, there was this big store that opened up down by NYU that was sort of ground-breaking called The Antique Boutique. It was a big deal. Basically, they had used clothing, and it was always packed. I used to go in there, and I used to marvel at this whole experience of people buying used clothing. The clothing was unbelievably heaping cool. It was the inklings of the beginning of the whole repurposing generation. I mean, this is 40 years ago, 42 years ago now. Talk a little bit about how did thredUP get started and also into the “Why?” How big is this problem of garment waste and the energy that it takes to make new garments, the water that it takes to make garments, the human rights, and the catastrophes that happened that are part of this whole ecosystem? Let’s talk about when did it start and what was the mission then, and where is it now?

Tanya: I love the founding story. thredUP has been around for over ten years now. It started with James, the current CEO, and one of the co-founders, walking into a thrift store in Boston. He was a student at the time. He had a bunch of shirts that he had used, but they were still in great condition. He tried to sell them, and he was turned away. For whatever reason, they didn’t meet quality standards. They didn’t sell men’s items, whatever. He came away from that experience just being like, “I’m not the only person that has experienced that. I have an unmonetized asset in my closet. I am confident that there are others and a huge kind of addressable market here for taking these items that are sitting unused in people’s closets and finding an easy way to bring them to the people that could still make use of them.” I think it was even like less of the sustainability focus in the beginning. It was more of just about like, “How do we continue using this?” As he started digging into it, the sustainability aspect in kind of the waste associated with fashion became a bigger piece of it. The first iteration of the company, I think was like a clothing swap for moms with kids. It was a swap model. Then, there’s been many iterations since. But I think one of the innovations was creating what we call the Clean Out Program, where customers can send in bags of used clothing in whatever condition they want. We sort through them and sell for them essentially through a managed marketplace. Then, the latest iteration, which is the kind of the iteration that I’m working on, is working directly with brand partners and helping brands capitalize on this kind of movement and bring this to the forefront of their brand value proposition — by offering both branded take-back programs or the clean out service that I just mentioned. Then, also setting up re-sell channels where they have a branded shop that they can sell their branded items directly to their customers.

John: Were going to get into that in a second. For our listeners out there who just joined us, we got Tanya Brinich with us. She’s the Senior Director of Resale-as-a-Service for thredUP. You can find Tanya and her colleagues in this very important website that’s doing great things, www.raas.thredup.com. Tanya, how big is this problem of clothing and garment waste? From an environmental sustainability point of view, explain the macro problem before we get into these great services that you’re offering and the division that you came in to run.

Tanya: Yes. Every year, consumers throw away into the trash thirty-six billion items of clothing. I mean, that’s billion with a “B”. It’s a huge number. Fast fashion has exacerbated this problem. Ninety-five percent of those items can be reused, they still have life in them. They’re not like the ruddy gym shorts or whatever that you actually sometimes have to throw stuff away. They’re actually just like a jean jacket that is oversized when the trend is short. And so, there’s just a lot of waste. To your point earlier, that translates into CO2 emissions of producing these items, water, the huge water impact, and just based in our landfills, right?

John: We’re clogging them up when we don’t have to. Wait a second. Step back for one second because these terms are used a lot. Remember, I’m almost 60 years old. Fast fashion, what is fast fashion now? I don’t understand. I’ve heard this vernacular recently, but I’m not familiar with it.

Tanya: Fast fashions are brands and companies that cater to hyper-trend-focused assortments and merchandising. You could think of Shein, H&M, and some other companies that you might be familiar with, where they were refreshing their assortments. It used to be like a traditional retailer would refresh their assortments at no basis, right? You would be like the spring season, and you get stuff out. These companies are doing it on a weekly if not more frequent basis, where there are fresh items posed online into their stores so regularly. As part of that, the marketing around that is getting into this hype of like, “You have to have this piece. This is the “It” piece, and then it’s the outfit of the day.” It’s a daily outfit that’s then discarded. A lot less emphasis on quality, timeless wear, and a lot more emphasis on style and kind of fashion and sort of that, like the fleeting aspects of it, where you have to have the latest trend in for that to be cool.

John: Fast really refers to the amount of the fast turnover of the clothing now?

Tanya: Yes, exactly.

John: It’s somewhat shocking that number is such an eye-popping number in terms of the amount of garments that are tossed away when you think… Growing up with institutions such as Goodwill and Salvation Army, you thought these garments would have places to go that everybody knew about that were being leveraged, but it doesn’t sound like that’s the case at all.

Tanya: I think some people are leveraging them. I think what’s challenging there is that a lot of this is folks that might not live near Goodwill. They might not have a car. If you’re buying something, if you’re buying an item a week and you need to clean out your closet, you’re trying to do it in the most efficient way possible a lot of times. Just the scale of which this problem has kind of grown just makes some of these more traditional… We’re all used to convenience now. It’s not super convenient to log a bunch of stuff to Goodwill, to dispose of it. I think that’s one area where thredUP has tried to solve for. It is like making it easier to find a responsible way to recycle and reuse your clothing through our clean out program.

John: Today, I go into my closet and I take out a bunch of clothes that I want thredUP to recycle. Walk us through the process.

Tanya: As a consumer, you can go on to the thredUP website. I’m going to talk about it through our brand lens.

John: Perfect. Go on. Do it through your brand lens. I want to hear exactly what you’re doing at thredUP, with the Resale-as-a-Service also.

Tanya: That’s exactly it. The Resale-as-a-Service platform offers two components. One is the branded take-back program. That is what we do with Gap. Let’s just take that example. I have a bunch of stuff that I am done with in my closet. I put it in a Clean Out Kit, which is either a physical bag that I can get at a Gap store or I can download a shipping label online through a landing page and put in on my old packages, like one of my Amazon boxes. Fill it up with up to 30 pounds of used clothing. Send it back to thredUP. We look through it. We have really high-quality standards of what we actually accept to sell. For anything we don’t sell, it goes into our responsibly-managed after-market program. It’s downcycled into insulation. It’s sent to thrift stores. it’s disposed in an appropriate way. Then, of the items that we do sell, we, actually, will take photographs of those items. We do a quality check like I said. We itemize them. We do measurements. Then, we list them on our marketplace, which has over 35,000 brands to sell.

One thing I didn’t mention, the Gap Clean Out Kit program, you don’t have to pick through and pick only your Gap item. You can send in any brands items through that program. Then, based on the items that sell and the credit that you earn, you then get a gift card back to Gap to kind of use that money that you’ve earned to shop again. It’s a great loyalty driver for brands, and it’s one of the big benefits for the brand. But for the consumer, it’s a way to kind of refresh your wardrobe and dispose or kind of find new homes for your clothing items.

John: It’s a win-win for everybody. The environment wins, and the world is a nicer, better place, cleaner place to be.

Tanya: Yes, exactly.

John: Great. Great, great. Now, talk about the non-consumer side, the business side.

Tanya: Again, what we do on our marketplace is we have a whole list of brands that we have. Just like another marketplace, you can find items based on brand, based on your size, based on other criteria, and based on trends. It’s just millions of items that you can shop as a consumer. We also then work with brands that have their own branded resale shops. An example of that is Madewell. They have a shop that’s called Madewell Forever. It’s a really popular shopping destination where they have only Madewell items in different categories featured on their core site. We will decide for the retailer. One thing I didn’t say earlier, thredUP is like, in addition to being an apparel, a retail, and a recycling sustainability company, it’s a tech company.

John: Right.

Tanya: We got a lot of tech and automation powering the experience that we manage as well as what we do for brands. We build a branded resale shop, essentially, for a company like Madewell, and then customers can go directly to that and browse the assortment of Madewell’s second-hand items in addition to kind of shopping new on the Madewell site.

John: I’m looking at some of these brands here, though. I mean, you’ve got Banana Republic, PacSun, Crocs, Adidas, Athleta, Abercrombie & Fitch, Hollister, and some of the best and greatest brands on the planet. Is this list constantly growing?

Tanya: Yes. This list is constantly growing. I think right now, about 50% of execs, over half of the execs, say resale is a really important part of their strategy in the next five years. It’s a strategic priority along with some of the other buzzwords you’re hearing all the time — omnichannel, personalization, and loyalty. It’s right up there with all those priorities. The list of brands participating in circularity in resale is growing constantly. Our client base has grown tremendously over the last year and is continuing to expand. We’ve got some upcoming big launches. We just launched Tommy Hilfiger. A couple of months ago, we got some other ones coming in the hopper. Then, just generally, this space is growing three times faster than the core power marketplace. Resale is stealing share and share of the closet from some of the other channels that you’re familiar with, like the outlet channel or rental or those types of things where they’re kind of just flat or trending down. Resale is taking that share of closet. I guess it’s no question or no doubt that the brands went into this growth. That’s why we’re seeing a lot of interest, from brands specifically.

John: Isn’t this a continuing of the offshoot of the shared economy, Airbnb, Uber? This is just a natural progression into the apparel industry. That’s what it sounds like to me. But is that truly what it is?

Tanya: Yes. There’s the rental space, which I think was pretty hot a few years ago, or companies run at the runway or actually clothing rental. This is a little bit different because you’re not renting the item. You’re buying the item second-hand. I would say it’s the internet version of what you described with that amazing store, the antique, whatever.

John: Antique Boutique.

Tanya: Antique Boutique. Right.

John: That was the place.

Tanya: It’s like the bringing that thrifting experience to an event to a broader base of consumers and the e-commerce space.

John: You feel good about what you’re doing. I mean, you feel good on the donation side, and you feel good on the buy side. There’s no one that feels bad in this whole equation.

Tanya: Yes, absolutely. We’ve done a lot of consumer surveys about our customers and how they engage with the programs. I think that positive sentiment like the positive emotion of feeling good, feeling like you’ve done something, sort of like being really excited… As I mentioned to you earlier, consumerism in sort of fashion and shopping have always been like really, really important and fun. Like, they’ve been big drivers of fun for me, coming from my background. I think just…

John: Right.

Tanya: …coming to America is like this, right?

John: Right.

Tanya: It’s fun to engage with those things. I think there’s a reason why we love it as a society. This is a way to do it in a way that’s more responsible and more sustainable and the way of the future.

John: Since ESG and circular economy, the shift from the linear to a circular economy is undeniable and unstoppable, Tanya.

Tanya: Yes.

John: Why would… If I’m the CEO of one of these fashion brands, whether it’s fast fashion or historical like Tommy Hilfiger, why wouldn’t I be running to the phone to call you because I have to live with shareholders, analysts, if I’m publicly traded, board members, and I have to answer to our circular economy behavior and ESG. Wouldn’t this just be a natural fit for any CEO and that runs a fashion brand today?

Tanya: Yes. I mean, I think you’re right. I think we’re seeing a lot of that. Like, wow, this is inevitable. This is going to happen to… It’s either we leverage it now and we be a first mover in the space…

John: Right.

Tanya: … before anything happen to us. There’s definitely a realization of that. I would say, on the spectrum of companies and their readiness to engage here, there’s some that are prioritizing it and jumping full steam ahead into like how can we, how can we get into this? Some are still worried. Some are like, “Wait, isn’t this going to cannibalize my core business?” Similar to when you had stores and you saw the rise of the internet and e-commerce, it was like, “Well, we’re not going to do e-commerce. It’s going to cannibalize our business. No way.” Now, no one in the right mind would have that mentality, right, as a leader of the company?

John: Right.

Tanya: There’s definitely a spectrum. I’d say, it’s still a nascent economy in this resale space. But I would say more and more leaders and folks that are looking to trends that are out there are seeing this as inevitable and as the way things are headed. It’s shifting in their minds from being a sustainability play, where it might not be like a growth driver, to actually, this is going to be what drives our business. This is going to be core to making sure we continue to grow. We can’t continue to grow in the way we’ve done in the past, where we just pump out a bunch of new stuff and throw away whatever doesn’t sell in that season. We have to find a more sustainable path forward and resale is part of that solution.

John: The brands that are part of your partner network, if they have overruns, overstocks or other clothing that’s imperfect, do you get all those materials as well?

Tanya: We actually focus on… Our primary bread and butter is consumer-to-consumer resale.

John: Got it.

Tanya: I would say that’s not our focus area.

John: Got it.

Tanya: There’s lots of other companies that do that. It’s something that we can do on a limited scale, but we don’t want that to be the focus of the resale space.

John: How many competitors do you have in this space? Because I don’t know of any, but that doesn’t mean I know the business.

Tanya: Yes. I’d say, it’s a pretty active marketplace right now. There’s a number of companies operating. There’s lots popping up every day.

John: Right.

Tanya: I’m a little biased, but I will say of the players in this space, we’re the only ones that have 10 years of experience…

John: Right.

Tanya: … and run our own marketplace.

John: You’re the leading brand right now?

Tanya: Yes. What I’m talking about specifically is the resales of service space.

John: Right.

Tanya: I think we actually own the trademark Resale-as-a-Service.

John: Pretty cool.

Tanya: There’s other companies offering that, but I think we were the first.

John: You mentioned the rental business before. Is that flat, a little bit down, or is that still rising as well? Because that could be considered part of the shared economy as well.

Tanya: Yes, I think that’s gone down. There was just a really big hype around that and it went down a little bit in recent years. I think with the pandemic especially where some of that formal rental dropped off. I actually don’t know what the trends have been over the last year as some of that has picked up. But I think, just generally, it’s been a little bit down over time.

John: Got you. Talk about like one of your normal day in life. Well, if I wasn’t interviewing you today, what’s your day like today at thredUP?

Tanya: Oh, man. My day, I can’t say that there’s like a typical day, but I will say, we have a pretty interesting and amazing work culture here. On Mondays, we have our team meetings, where we have our executive team meeting, and then we have what we call our marketplace meeting, where we learn about sort of just general trends and the health of the business. Monday, sort of like, get focused on metrics, get focused on priorities for the week, and align on what’s happening. Tuesdays are what we call maker days, so we try not to schedule meetings on Tuesdays, any kind of internal meetings at least, and try to do heads-down work. Yesterday, I was working on our forecast and building out some of our assumptions around our financial forecast. I also don’t have the luxury of not having external meetings on Tuesdays, so I often have check-ins with clients every day of the week. Whenever I can squeeze those in, I meet with all of our clients, at least on a quarterly basis, and some of our bigger brands and meeting with them, monthly, or weekly.

John: Let’s talk about that. Post-pandemic, are most of your check-ins still like this or some of them becoming in person as well?

Tanya: Yes, great question. Most of my client meetings have been like this.

John: Okay.

Tanya: We’ve had a few opportunities to give clients tours of our warehouses or just do conference-type meetings. I would say those are just so valuable. I feel a little bit more of a close connection when I get to meet someone. I’m sure it’s reciprocal, so any opportunity I have to meet with a client in person, I snap it up. But most of our regular meetings have been virtual still.

John: Got it. How many people… You’re talking about your great culture before we get… I want to hear about Wednesdays because obviously Wednesday is polka dot Wednesdays.

Tanya: Polka dot Wednesday. Yes, Wednesday’s actually an office day.

John: Perfect. How many people work for thredUP?

Tanya: We have actually, [inaudible] top of my head. Approximately, in our corporate functions, I think we’re like in hundreds.

John: Right.

Tanya: It’s pretty small. And then across our D.C. base, there’s obviously thousands of employees working in our fulfillment centers.

John: Got it. Your centers roll across the United States?

Tanya: Yes.

John: Is this eventually a model that could be taken international?

Tanya: Yes, we actually do have international operations in Eastern Europe. We acquired a company in Eastern Europe in 2021. We are operating there and a company in Latin America that we have a stake in as well.

John: Let’s go back to your typical day. Besides polka dots, what else happens in Wednesdays in the office? Wednesdays, everyone’s in the office.

Tanya: In office Wednesdays. Yes. That’s when I have my team meeting. That’s a fun time. Usually, just try to catch up on clients and communications in between those meetings. But I try to have all my face-to-face meetings with folks that are located in the Oakland area on Wednesdays. That’s always really fun. Today, we had an All Hands. Our whole company All Hands was today. Then we usually do some fun like lunches or happy hours on Wednesdays, too. Then Thursdays are the end of our week, we’re wrapping up our work. We have a four-day work week. Fridays are a time to catch up, if you want to, or to just treat it as a weekend day. I’ve honestly have found myself to be like I don’t even know how many more times productive with a four-day work week because I do end up working on Fridays often, but it’s catch-up work. I get to like have that mental headspace of I’m not going to have a hundred internal meetings on a Friday. Then like, take me into my weekend.

John: Right.

Tanya: I’m having client meetings if I need to, but it’s also just planning, focus time and reflection.

John: Like you said, this is a nascent period for a whole circular economy taking hold in that generational shift from linear to circular economy. Apparel is a big part of it because apparel, obviously, is a big part of what the problem was in terms of landfills and sustainability. How big is your hit list? You must come into work and you must have a hit list of brands that you want to partner with.

Tanya: Oh, yes.

John: Pretty wide and big.

Tanya: Yes. Hundreds of thousands.

John: Wow.

Tanya: We have a sales team. My counterpart, who is the head of sales, on Monday is another meeting. We have our pipeline review report, where we’re going through the list of companies that we’re approaching and targeting. Like I said, this interest and growth in this space are white hot right now. There’s still a lot of education to be done. While people may have heard like you of like circularity, what does it mean practically to me as a brand? That’s a question executives still are really grappling with. Even if they’re like, “Yes, yes, I know what that is.” They’re like, “Wait, but what?” like, “What is it? What do I do?” I think we’re still doing a lot of education around that.

John: When you were taking this job, obviously, anytime anyone makes a big life decision and takes on a new career path, it’s a big decision. What unexpected good things are happening that you never even expected six months ago before taking this position?

Tanya: Yes. I’m just getting so much closer to tech and so much closer to kind of like the engineering side of things, the product side. I think that’s something that I really value. I love that intersection of retail and technology. Even in my prior roles, that what I was interested in and what I sought out. But at a company like thredUP, which is more of “We’re a public company, but we still have a scrappy startup mentality.” You’re just close to things. There’s a lot of transparency. There’s a lot of communication, and a lot of access to decisions that are being made, how things are being done. I talk to my engineering counterpart, my product counterpart almost every day.

John: Wow.

Tanya: It’s really cool to be able to say like, “Hey. I just got this feedback from a client. What can we do about it?” People be like, “Oh, I already did that.” Like I took your feedback and I made this change, it’s alive. That’s like mind blowing to me still.

John: Right. It’s a lot of gratification and really fast. You don’t have to wait to get into a tech queue where, “Oh, we’ll solve that a year from now,” meanwhile, you’ll get 10 other client complaints along the way.

Tanya: Yes, exactly. Yes. I think there’s still things that are like, “Okay. These are big. We have to prioritize and get them into the tech queue, but small things,” people just jump on them and fix them.

John: Talk about the future. You’re six months in, so you really have… Now, you had your rookie stage, and now, you really got your sleeves rolled up, so to speak. What’s going to happen in the months and years ahead for thredUP? What’s the vision and what are you super excited about?

Tanya: Yes, I think we’re talking a lot about our growth plans and what’s next. We have a lot of just products. Like I was just talking about, a lot of product enhancements on the roadmap. Building tools to make these programs easier for brands to manage, more integrated with other brand offerings like their loyalty programs, and just building out other functionality. Letting brands bring this experience into their stores more seamlessly. I’m really excited about that. I think that’s the new features. Adjusting the program and growing the program is one thing. Then, also just like working with more brands, increasing the number of partners we have, how we work with them, what we offer them, and how we help them grow. I think that’s another. For me, personally, talking to our existing clients and saying, “Hey. Here’s where you are. What are your goals? I think you can get to two X.” I get to push them and be like, “What’s stopping you from having 1% of your customers, 10% of your customers engage with this?”

John: Truly, this is, in terms of… If we were looking at this industry and this opportunity as a baseball game, you’re in the top of the second, bottom of the first, top of the third. Where are we?

Tanya: Oh, God. I am like a terrible sports fan. We’re at the beginning of the baseball game for sure.

John: [inaudible] the first or second inning?

Tanya: I would say for brand-led resale, yes, we’re at the beginning. For thredUP and our expertise in resale in general, we’re further along, right? We’ve got 11 years under our belt. We’ve figured some stuff out. We’ve tried some business models. We’ve iterated. It’s a cool combination of like being in sort of this like new business line within the company and then having the experience of the broader and larger company behind us.

John: Your CEO walks in your office after this interview and he says to you, “Guess who just called me, guess what brand just called me?” What brand are you hoping rolls off of his tongue? What’s your dream brand to get this year?

Tanya: Brand?

John: But I’ll give you away any secrets.

Tanya: Yes, I mean, it’s hard. We’ve definitely got some in the hopper.

John: Okay. I don’t want to put you on this.

Tanya: I don’t know if I can answer that one.

John: Okay. No, that’s okay.

Tanya: My dream brand is in the hopper.

John: Okay. Good. But obviously, there’s a lot going on. That’s the fun part.

Tanya: Yes, there’s definitely a lot going on.

John: Again, this is a no-brainer from the CEO. Any apparel brand, big or small, this is the place I want to be.

Tanya: Yes, absolutely.

John: Right?

Tanya: Yes, it’s very true. I think I would say the one thing I haven’t really hit on for a value proposition for brands is one of the things that a lot of brands are struggling with is how to appeal to a younger consumer and how to be more relevant. This is where younger consumers are focused. They care about sustainability.

John: Brilliant.

Tanya: They’re thinking about the planet in their decisions, and they’re already thinking secondhand first. They’re already thinking how can I get something thrifted. That’s cool. To any brand that’s maybe trying to increase it’s relevancy or is already relevant with a younger customer and wants to just stand behind its values, this really is an important aspect of the play here.

John: That’s a brilliant point because they grew up with Uber. They grew up with Airbnb. Very all normalized. The shared economy is normalized to the new buying generation. I think you’re so spot on. That is such an important point. I know we have a couple of plugs I want to make. Talk a little bit about the Recommerce 100. Talk a little bit about that and why that’s important.

Tanya: Yes. The Recommerce 100 is a survey that we’ve been conducting since the beginning of this year. We’re publishing a list of brand-led resale shops along with the number of items listed just to bring awareness to how brands are engaging here. Since we started running this survey, we started with 40 brands on that list. Now, this month, this is a little spoiler alert, it’s likely that we’re going to top a hundred. We’re actually going to get to that Recommerce 100.

John: That’s huge.

Tanya: Just tracking that growth shows and illustrates how this is taking off.

John: People could find that at recommerce100.com. Talk a little bit about your annual resale report, why that’s important, what’s in there, and what people should be looking for if they want to find it and download it?

Tanya: Yes. I can’t recommend it more as a resource. I actually read the resale report years before I joined thredUP. We’ve been publishing it for 10 years.

John: Wow.

Tanya: This most recent one, which came out in April, is our 10th edition. What’s cool about that is that you can see trends year over year and how things have evolved. There’s like different formats of it for brands or for investors or kind of the general report. There’s just tons of information there. We work with a company called GlobalData. It’s a third-party polling firm, where we actually collect and conduct consumer research to inform this. You can find information about the growth of the resale channel, some of those stats that I quoted to you about, where different segments are taking share and growing. They’re all in there over time. Consumer attitudes by generation, thrifting behavior by different geographies. That’s a fun one. What’s popular in what area of the country? What are the segments that we see? There’s just a wealth of stats and information there. I think it’s a great primer on what’s happening in resale and what’s happened over time. Then, also just a really good place to look if you’re in a company or that you want to make a case for resale, it’s the place to be.

John: Got it. People can find that at thredup.com/resale. That’s where that report resides. When you’re making deals with these brands and bringing these brands on with your sales team, who are the decision-makers on the other side? Is it the CEO or is it the brand manager? [inaudible] Who should we be giving a shoutout or to be called dialing your digits?

Tanya: Yes, it’s interesting you ask that. It’s actually pretty fascinating since this is usually a pretty visible aspect of a brand, how they show up to a customer. It often does go all the way up to the CEO for approval. It’ll start with usually a brand manager, someone in sustainability, someone on the marketing side, or growth in the growth department.

John: Got it.

Tanya: Then, it’ll make its way through because it’s a cross-functional effort and it does often require sort of leadership and buy-in from the very top. I think where we’ve seen the most success is companies that have that, where there is the CEO that says, “This is important to us. We’re going to prioritize it.” Not just sign the contract, but also say, down the road, that we’re going to keep this as a priority for our brand.

John: Got it. For our listeners and viewers, if you want to find Tanya and her colleagues and get your brand to sign up to the thredUP, go to www.raas.thredup.com. Tanya, you are amazing. I’m so glad Judy introduced us. I’m so thankful that we get to put the thredUP word out there. You guys are making a tremendous impact. I’m just honored to have you on the show. You’re always welcome back with any other announcements or updates and list all the new brands that signed up because that’s what should be happening. They should be piling in right now. Just grateful for you making the world a better place.

Tanya: Thanks so much. It’s been awesome to talk to you, John. Really appreciate it. Thanks again.

John: This episode of the Impact Podcast is brought to you by Closed Loop Partners. Closed Loop Partners is a leading circular economy investor in the United States with an extensive network of Fortune 500 corporate investors, family offices, institutional investors, industry experts, and impact partners. Closed Loops platform spans the arc of capital from venture capital to private equity, bridging gaps and fostering synergies to scale the circular economy. To find Closed Loop Partners, please go to www.closedlooppartners.com.

Conserving Water and Energy with Ezra Garrett

John Shegerian: Welcome back to Green is Good and we’re so honored to have with us today Ezra Garrett. He’s the Vice President of Community Relations and the Chief Sustainability Officer for PG&E. Welcome to Green is Good, Ezra.

Ezra Garrett: John, thank you for having us.

John: You know, Ezra, before we get into talking about your great brand, PG&E, and all the wonderful things you’re doing there in sustainability, please share your story and your journey leading up to there.

Ezra: Well, first and foremost, thank you for the opportunity to visit with you and your listeners here today. It’s a real privilege to have the job that I have at a company like PG&E. Part of my role is to oversee our company’s community involvement program and charitable giving and employee volunteerism and the other big part of my job is to help lead the sustainability function and that involves a lot of the reporting that our company does around our sustainability efforts and it involves working with all of our lines of business at PG&E to help them to understand what other companies are doing to operate their business in a sustainable way and to support their good work of delivering safe, reliable, and affordable energy but doing that in a way that really adds value to the communities that we serve. The way I landed here, I spent really the last 15 years or so working primarily in the public affairs space and about seven years ago, a lot of that work involved supporting the work that our company was doing addressing environmental issues here in our service area so in the mid-2000s, I was involved in a project to help install PG&E owned solar panels at AT&T ballpark. It was part of our effort to demonstrate to our customers that this technology that was very new at the time, solar power, was actually something that was accessible to all and you could integrate a facility like that into an iconic ballpark and do it in a way that didn’t disrupt the architecture there and that really ignited in me a passion for helping customers to understand the opportunities related to renewable energy and energy efficiency, which is a big part of our work here at PG&E. Fast forward to a couple years ago. Our company made the decision to really try to better integrate the work that we do supporting our local communities through our CSR efforts here, to integrate that with our company’s corporate sustainability program and that’s when I was given the opportunity to take on this role and that’s why I’m here talking to you today.

John: Well, you’re a humble guy so is it safe to say that you’re the first sustainability officer in PG&E’s history?

Ezra: I’m not. I’m lucky to be the second one and fill the first guy’s shoes.

John: That’s wonderful. The real truth of the matter is that if we were having this conversation 15 years ago, maybe 11, 12 years ago, this is something new to large and big and important brands like yours that really do get to move the needle when it comes to making decisions but historically as corporate America goes, there hasn’t been the roles of chief sustainability officers and now there are and you get to be the second one at such an important brand so that is totally fascinating to us and to our listeners.

Ezra: Yeah, you’re right. It really is something that is still kind of emerging from the corporate and organizational standpoint. I’m kind of part of what’s been referred to as the second generation of chief sustainability officers but the lifespan for any sort of position in corporate America is three, five years so when you’re talking about being part a brand new second generation, you’re really talking about a function that has really only been around five, six years so there’s still only kind of a relative handful of us and I think that the role that I occupy as the Chief Sustainability Officer, I think it says more about the company that I work for and the companies that my CSO colleagues work for. I think it really indicates a commitment by these companies to make sure that they’re doing everything they can to operate their business in a sustainable way.

John: For our listeners out there that want to follow along on your iPad or your laptop or whatever you’ve got in front of you right now as we enjoy this great chat with Ezra Garrett today, please go to www.pgecorp.com/sustainability. I’m on the site now. It’s gorgeous and it’s chock full of information. It’s really, like you say, Ezra, somewhat of a new position in Corporate America and at PG&E. Let’s talk about definition. What is the definition of corporate sustainability officer at PG&E today and how do you define sustainability at PG&E in your role?

Ezra: That’s a great question, John. It’s one that we, in this role, get quite often and then truth is the definition is really evolving and expanding. I think that five years ago, sustainability, for most folks, meant a focus on environmental issues relating to the way a company operates its business. The way we define it now really spans the entirety of our efforts to provide safe, reliable, and affordability to our customers. Really, it’s about providing our basic service but doing that in a way that adds value to the communities that we serve and creates economic opportunities for our customers in those local communities and also insures that we’re engaging our employees in identifying ways for us to deliver our services but to do it in a way that not only provides economic opportunity but also minimizes our impact on the environment. One example that I think makes it clear is the way that we purchase our utility vehicles. In your neighborhood, you probably see those local utilities bucket trucks. Those are those big trucks with buckets that go up and down to the overhead electric lines. We looked at what we could do in terms of how we procure those vehicles to provide economic opportunities for our customers. Those are a big investment. Those are expensive but we need them and we found a manufacturer, a company called All Tech, that was designing a bucket truck that could run, certain parts of it, on battery power so actually operating the lift. Usually those vehicles need to idle. They make a lot of noise. It’s a lot of emissions. You burn fuel so the challenge for them was it’s expensive for them to get this manufacturing up and running without a large commitment from a company like ours to buy a bunch of them so we cut a deal with All Tech and basically, what they committed to do if we bought a big number of these vehicles was to set up a big manufacturing plant right here in our service area, in Northern California. This created 100 new manufacturing jobs for our customers here and it allowed them to scale up their operations so that they could get this technology up and running, bring their costs down over time, and sell to other companies. Those other companies are looking at how we’re using the trucks and not only are we reducing emissions because of these battery powered trucks and minimizing our impact on the environment, we’re also saving a significant amount of fuel costs as well and it’s a real safety opportunity because when these vehicles are idling to operate those buckets, it’s very difficult for folks that are up in those buckets to communicate with the folks that are on the ground so it’s really sort of a triple win for our company and a great example for how we approach sustainability here at PG&E.

John: It’s a beautiful looking truck. I’m looking at it. It’s a big blue truck with ‘Clean Fuel Fleet’ on the side here, right?

Ezra: Yep, that’s the one.

John: That’s beautiful and I’m looking at it online. You know, you have so many great initiatives on the website that I want to ask you about but before we get there, because we are both citizens of the great state of California, one of the top issues that has not only made California news for the past couple of years but also national news is the drought issue and talk a little bit about PG&E’s interrelationship with the drought and what role PG&E is playing because when you talk about sustainability, of course, one of the greatest issues of our time is climate change. The other is the limited resources that we have that are continuing to be limited and water is one of those. How does PG&E and water and the drought interrelate?

Ezra: Thanks for asking that question. We’re an energy company and most folks don’t really think of us as having a significant role to play addressing the state’s water issues. We’re not the water company but fundamentally, as you said it, this is a really difficult time from a water standpoint in California. We’ve just experienced the driest year in state history and everyone has to have a role to play in address this so as a company, we’ve made the commitment to reduce over five years, the water that we use at our buildings and facilities by 20 percent. In terms of how we operate our business and work with our customer’s, we looked at the energy efficiency program that our company runs and we’ve been able to estimate that the savings associated with those energy efficient programs -These are programs that we incentivize our customers to do by giving them a rebate- are saving more than 1.3 billion gallons of water per year. That’s billion with a B and that’s roughly equivalent to the annual water use of nearly 8,000 households in California. Each year, we also host, annually, a water conservation showcase here in our headquarter facility in San Francisco. We have a facility here called the Pacific Energy Center that really allows us to demonstrate for our customers and different contractors and businesses different energy savings features that they can put into their homes, facilities, buildings, appliances, lighting, and we do a special showcase that focuses on energy efficiency opportunities associated with water reducing technologies so we just hosted that earlier this week and it was the biggest attendance that we’ve ever had for that event and I think it really underscores the focus that everyone is putting on the water issue and also highlights a role that we as a company can play but, as you said, it’s really a responsibility for all of us to address the water issues here.

John: For our listeners that just tuned in recently, we’ve got Ezra Garrett on with us. He’s the Vice President of Community Relations and the Chief Sustainability Officer of PG&E and if you want to follow along with us during our interview, it’s www.pgecorp.com/sustainability. At the top of my last question, I mentioned climate change. PG&E, climate change. Talk a little bit about that interrelationship and everything that your great company is doing to roll back the massive tide that is already underway with regards to global warming and climate change and how that progress is going right now under your leadership.

Ezra: I talked a little bit about some of the things that we’re doing as a company from a corporate sustainability perspective but I think really one of the hallmarks of the work that our company is doing to really address emissions is really the work that we do with our customers to encourage them to basically use less of the product that we deliver. It’s really our energy efficiency program and the 30 years track record that we have in encouraging them to use less. Over that span of time, California’s energy uses remain flat per capita, whereas in the rest of the country, energy uses per capita has gone up by roughly 50 percent, which is pretty significant. Over that span, we’ve helped our customers save billions of dollars in energy costs and we’ve also been able to avoid the need to build about 30 power plants and, again, that’s simply by encouraging our customers to use less. We serve one in 20 Americans and virtually all of those customers are Californians so it’s really a credit to our customers here and our outreach teams, our work with them to identify what are the things that our customers are interested in doing to help them reduce their usage.

John: That’s a great point. That’s an incredible statistic. Energy usage has gone up 50 percent across America. We know Californians continue to grow their population but PG&E and their efforts with the great citizens of California have kept that energy usage flat. Great statistic. Since we’re a solution based show, can you just give a plug right now on who your potential clients in California should be contacting if they want to learn more about how to save energy with your unique programs in California? How do they do that if they don’t feel like they’re doing enough in their household now? Who do they reach out to when they stop listening to this show?

Ezra: They can do two things. They can go to www.pge.com. We have all of the information there on that site for our customers who want to reach out to us and learn more about what they can do in their homes or in their businesses to reduce their energy usage. You can also call 1(800) 743-5000 if you want to speak to a person live to learn about things that our company offers, both in terms of low cost or in terms of rebate that we offer to customers who do take action to install an appliance that uses less energy. By the way, I’ll mention that a lot of these appliances that use less energy also use a lot less water so please do reach out to us because we’re here to help.

John: That’s awesome. I see online here that you have a lot of reports and a lot of great information in the sustainability section. Can you talk about some of your most recent findings? Give the highlights of the recent findings of your newly commissioned Economic Impact Report?

Ezra: We’re really excited about this report because it helps us to measure the extent to which we’re conducting our business in a way that adds economic value and supports the economic engine for the state of California and so what we did was we looked at the total economic impact of the investments that we’re doing, of the infrastructure work that we’re doing, of the energy efficiency rebates that we’re sending out to our customers and we were really actually surprised by the total numbers that were found in that study and so what we saw was last year, through this work , we supported over 71,000 jobs here in our state and contributed over 22 billion dollars of economic activity in our service area last year. That was really encouraging but for us it’s just the first step in understanding what our work is and now our goal is to see if we can’t keep moving the needle and enhancing the numbers going forward.

John: You know what I love about your company? Because I’m, of course, a client of yours so I’m very biased but it’s not just about doing one or two things green or the most overt things. You try to do even the little things so even online, it says, you have even have made the billing process go green in terms of you have e-billing so we save the trees, we make it easier on the clients in California. You’ve really made that even seamless and really into the new technology that we’re going into in terms of the e-billing and how your clients can pay for their PG&E fees every month.

Ezra: Thank you for mentioning that. It’s something that we really try and challenge ourselves to do, to find other innovative ways to minimize our impact on the environment but in a lot of ways, it’s really just us fulfilling the expectations that our customers have for us. Our customers want these products and services. We’ve done some cool things but we can always do better so that’s really our commitment to our customers. In a lot of ways, we’re just trying to keep up with them.

John: We have about four minutes or so. Ezra, any other specific sustainability issues that PG&E is tackling in a way that you’re really proud of that you want to share with our customers?

Ezra: I appreciate that question. One of the things we do that’s kind of behind the scenes because it doesn’t involve encouraging our customers to take their own actions to use less energy but one of the things that we’re working very hard is to increase the amount of energy, the percentage of energy, that we provide to our customers that is greenhouse gas emission free. We have been working hard at this for years and years, decades, and one of the things we’re really proud of is that more than half of the electricity that we send to our customers comes from greenhouse gas free sources and for a company of our size that delivers this much energy to as many customers as we do, it really is the cleanest energy profile in the nation and we’d just like to share that with our customers so that they understand when they flip the switch, they’re getting some of the cleanest energy in the country.

John: Ezra, because you touch so many facets of sustainability and are able to see some of the most cutting edge technologies that are on the horizon or that already exist, do you have some pearls of wisdom in terms of advice to share with our listeners out there that run their own companies or are already executives at other companies that they could implement to be more sustainable to become part of the solution instead of being part of the problem?

Ezra: I would say that the one piece of advice that I have is I think equally relevant if you are the owner of your business or a senior executive at a business or if you’re an employee at a business that’s looking to get involved in sustainability and that advice is really that the sustainability efforts, the most impactful sustainability initiatives at any given company are those that are led by everyday employees in departments that are actually outside of the sustainability functions. If you look at our sustainability report, most of the content and the examples of what we’re doing to be sustainable are involving just core business operations. They’re examples of, like I said, procuring our bucket trucks in a way that minimizes our impact on the environment and creates economic opportunities for others. Who would think that a person in the fleet department would play a pivotal role to play in sustainability? But I still go around every day using that as a key example for how our company is making itself more sustainable so if you’re an executive looking at how you run a program, what I would say is engage the people in your company. Engage the entire workforce across all your lines of business in that work and if you’re someone who’s not in the sustainability function but you’re looking for a way to get involved, I would say to look at the processes that you do and the services that you’re providing and little by little, start thinking about ways that you can make those more sustainable because as you’re removing steps from processes and removing material from the transactions that you do, you’re also saving money so that’s an economic driver as well and I think that’s a very powerful motivator if you’re an employee that has to convince your boss to do something a different way from a sustainability standpoint. If you look a little harder, you can usually find an economic argument to make that change as well.

John: The bottom line is that there is a bottom line to sustainability. The old fallacy that sustainability is more expensive to implement and to do is really out the window now. Sustainability can actually save money and has a great bottom line to it.

Ezra: Absolutely. I couldn’t have said it any better, John.

John: Listen, Ezra, we’re so honored that you came on today. We always want you to feel free to come back and share all the great things that PG&E is doing for sustainability. For our listeners out there, to learn more about PG&E and their sustainability program, you can go to www.pgecorp.com/sustainability. Ezra Garrett, thank you for being a sustainability superstar. You are truly living proof that green is good

Better Care for a Better World with Lisa Morden

As one of the driving forces in corporate sustainability, Lisa Morden sits at the intersection of sustainability and the global supply chain for Kimberly-Clark, the global company behind iconic consumer brands including Huggies, Kleenex, Scott and Kotex. Morden’s task as vice president of safety, sustainability and occupational health is to lead an ambitious set of goals for how the company will have a lasting impact on the people it serves and the communities it touches.

John Shegerian: Hey, friendly listener. Are you enjoying the Impact podcast? Then give us a thumbs up and leave a 5-star review on iTunes, Spotify, Google Play, or wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts. This edition of the impact podcast is brought to you by ERI. ERI has a mission to protect people, the planet, and your privacy, and is the largest fully integrated IT and electronics asset disposition provider and cybersecurity-focused hardware destruction company in the United States and maybe even the world. For more information on how ERI can help your business properly dispose of outdated electronic hardware devices, please visit eridirect.com.

John: Welcome to another edition of the Impact podcast. I’m John Shegerian and I’m so excited to have you with us today. Lisa Morden, she’s the Vice President of Safety, Sustainability and Occupational Health with Kimberly-Clark. Welcome, Lisa to the Impact podcast.

Lisa Morden: Thank you so much for having me today, John. Very excited to connect and have a chat with you.

John: Lisa, we were talking a little bit off the air before we started taping and it goes with great honor that I’m able to say that in 2019 Greenbiz, which is one of the greatest platforms in the sustainability world named you one of the 25 badass women shaking up the corporate climate movement. Share a little bit about Lisa Morden, your story growing up, and how you became named one of the 25 badass women shaking up the corporate cl climate movement over at Kimberly-Clark.

Lisa: You bet John and shout out to Greenbiz. I love that group, that team they’ve been incredibly supportive and helpful for the movement, shall we say?

John: Right.

Lisa: We’ve always gotten a ton of value of working with that group so appreciate the recognition, no question. I’m a small-town Canadian girl, actually. I grew up in a small-town in Northwestern, Ontario, and all family and friends all grew up there. We spent a lot of time outdoors actually living up in the heart of the Canadian boreal forest if you will. A lot of time outdoors and a lot of family and friends are really highly connected to the forest products industry and to the natural resource-based industry. You grew up with a huge appreciation and a value for what natural resource management and forest management could do for people, families, communities, et cetera. That was a big inspiration for me. I think through time also spent a little bit of time living in Asia in the middle east when I was young as well. You see, you see a very different world, obviously, John.

John: Right.

Lisa: You saw the implications of poverty, socioeconomic disparity, and even insecurity and security stressors in the world. I think that just sort of really opens up your views and shapes a lot of your perspectives on the world and certainly helped to shape some of my career ambitions and aspirations too. Very quickly all of that brought me to an amazing opportunity to work at a Pulp Mill that Kimberly-Clark ran in Northwestern, Ontario. That was my first start with the company back when I was a young whipper snapper if you will.

John: How many years have you been in and around Kimberly-Clark?

Lisa: I’m approaching my 30 year anniversary, John. It’s been since I was clearly a very young.

John: Wow. That doesn’t look physically possible, but whatever it is, what it is, and 30 years is a long time, but Kimberly-Clark is has been around a long time.

Lisa: Yeah.

John: Talk a little bit. If you’ve been there 30 years of working in that ecosystem, like you’re saying starting off at a Pulp Mill to now, can you share some of the highlights of your career and things that you now could look back on? We’re going to talk about the forward in a little bit and where we are today and where we are going and where Kimberly-Clark’s going in the future, but talk a little bit about looking backwards, some of the highlights and some of the most enjoyable moments and proud moments of your career.

Lisa: Oh, thanks, John. Absolutely, working in that pulp mill environment right, is very environmentally intensive, an operation with forest lands, et cetera. We had a lot of big challenges and an amazing small but mighty team. I think as getting started in the environmental management space back then in my career and seeing how that team rallied to support improving outcomes, both environmentally and within the community was super inspiring to me. Something that I’ve continued to try to replicate throughout the course of my career. Coming out of that environment and doing some turns in various functional roles within Kimberly-Clark in North America, but then certainly expanding around the world to our operations and helping to support the teams around the world to drive their environmental programs has been a big highlight for me and certainly influenced the path forward. I did, of course, take a couple of spins in our business teams as well, which was certainly outside of my wheelhouse, but an amazing learning opportunity to understand the inner workings of the business from multiple perspectives and angles. Huge pivot point for me and as time went on, I had some really fantastic bosses in those roles and supervisors that really encouraged me to build principles of sustainability into the business that I was helping to lead and run at the time. Now, you begin to shape it from a product perspective and a brand perspective, and a customer consumer perspective. Hugely, influential experience for me as we went along the journey.

John: It doesn’t make, and what I realized along the way, interviewing so many wonderful people at great brands like you, and like Kimberly-Clark is that when you’ve been through the line in different shape way shapes or form, and then not just been in a sustainability position, but no, got to know the products and the business groups, and some people are supply chain managers that I meet before they become chief sustainability officers. You really can make a bigger impact once you get the sustainability title, then as well, because you have a deeper knowledge of really the business and how it really runs. Is that true?

Lisa: A 100% true, couldn’t agree with you more. I don’t think sustainability is a multidisciplinary function.

John: Right.

Lisa: It’s a team sport, right?

John: Right.

Lisa: It requires your supply chain teams and your brand teams and your marketing teams and your innovation teams to all really be collaborating with that sort of value chain view all the way from the source. Source to shelves, dump to dump if you will.

John: Right.

Lisa: They’re really understanding those perspectives allows you to walk a mile in the shoes of those other functional areas that are pivotal to help make a difference. It touches everything in the organization. You have to be a little bit dynamic in your ability to talk the language.

John: How many years have you had this title, Vice President of Safety, Sustainability, and Occupational Health?

Lisa: I have been in this specific role for approaching 3 years at this point.

John: Wow. Got it.

Lisa: Yeah.

John: If I was to ask you the Lisa Morden life mantra or mission statement, what would it be?

Lisa: Maybe it’s not so much a mantra, but it’s certainly a philosophy that I like to live by, which is very much about being mindful of how, when I engage with people across the business and outside the business, frankly, how do I make them feel? I really need a sense of inspiration and understanding of the world of the possible, right?

John: Yeah.

Lisa: With at this at the same time, creating a sense of urgency because some of the challenges that face the world from a sustainability perspective are imperative. And the scenarios are becoming more concerning every second that takes by so inspiring innovation and a growth mindset while at the same time, creating that imperative and sense of urgency is kind of how I like to operate generally speaking. Strategic thinking with an action bias is put another way. That’s how I like to operate throughout the organization.

John: Speaking of the organization, obviously everyone knows Kimberly-Clark and the iconic brand that it is and the brands that you own and that we’ve all grown up with and come to love over 150 years. For our listeners and viewers who want to find Lisa and her great colleagues and all the important work they’re doing at Kimberly-Clark, you can go to www.kimberly-clark.com. How big is the organization? It’s 150 years old, we have the age, but how big is it now?

Lisa: Yeah. I mean, the company is about 43,000 employees strong at this point, right? With that very large global footprint. The exciting part about that is that we operate in so many different cultures in different countries with different markets. You really have this wonderful opportunity, I think, to integrate a lot of diverse perspectives. We think about our goals and ambitions for a more sustainable feature as a company the perspectives that come to the table to shape that and to help to define the initiatives and how we activate are coming from just massively different backgrounds and diverse backgrounds. I think that’s part of the power of how we have been progressing and the power of unlocking our teams to move forward with some really great outcomes, ultimately.

John: The company’s purpose is better care for a better world. What does that mean to you? What does that mean for the companies and how at the size that you are, how do you make sure that you model your employees get that message and understand what it means, but also your clients and constituents around…

Lisa: Yeah, it’s interesting because that I articulate better care for a better world is just a wonderful cause and mission that really activates and inspires the organization on a lot of different fronts, and the way that we translate better care for a better world through the… I’d say the lens of sustainability is about our mission to make lives better with the smallest environmental footprint, which translates pretty well into the overarching ambitions and goals for sustainability, for us, that involve things like how do we help to support underserved and vulnerable communities. Through the purpose of our brands and make lives better, help improve health and wellbeing outcomes for people around the world, whether they’re consumers or not how do we support the communities and the consumers and the markets where we have business and operations? Then complimenting that, of course, is how we do that in a way that reduces the environmental impacts of the work that we do. Positive social contributions with minimal social costs is the way to think about it. Our environmental goals then really revolve around four key areas that are pretty much focused on business relevance, those things that we feel like we have an ability to meaningfully help and support its climate change. It’s reducing waste in our use of single-use plastics. It’s thinking about forests where some of the raw materials for our products are sourced to be sure that those forests remain healthy and viable going forward and then finally water, ensuring that where we have operations that consume a lot of water are doing so in a way that doesn’t create any problems, liabilities concerns with communities around those operations. We’ve got a pretty strong focus in those 4 years.

John: Yeah. It’s so interesting. We have years behind us, but it’s interesting the times we live in today.

Lisa: Yeah.

John: That I feel, but I would love your opinion on this, that the world is more interested in sustainability, ESG circular economy, whatever you want to call it. Here we’re talking about sustainability and better care for a better world than ever before. That’s to me, we’re at a very exciting inflection point where it’s not a choice anymore. It almost feels like it’s really, truly a DNA imperative of all great organizations to really roll up their sleeves and get with it.

Lisa: John, I think that’s so true. It gets to that ambition that I think most people sitting in my seat and a lot of different companies have really been working for a long time, which is how do you integrate some of these principles into the ways of working of the entire organization of a large company or a small company is critically important. That means activation and integration into not just the supply chain, which is critically important, right?

John: Right.

Lisa: Looking across, how we source raw materials to how we manufacture very important course. But it’s also about, what is the role that our brands play to engage their customers and their consumers in a different way? How do we align the purpose of the brands to the initiatives that we deploy in communities?

Lisa: How do we ensure that our research and engineering and our product design and materials development teams are all thinking about the environmental and social impacts of the next generation of Huggies diapers, for example? That is an incredibly exciting part of the work, frankly, because it the opportunity that sustainability presents to drive creative solutions and innovation is quite amazing, actually. That’s the big opportunity of the future is what’s the innovation pathways. What are the innovation pathways and what are those look like, and how do we make good choices that allow the business to be resilient going into the future? And for the long term.

John: Obviously Lisa, you’re a senior member of this whole sustainability and safety and health team, and nothing’s more important than safety and health and a company can’t be sustainable without its people healthy and safe on a daily basis 7/24. But what I’m always fascinated about is the process, Lisa. When you get in a room with a whiteboard with your colleagues at Kimberly-Clark, and you start thinking about next year’s CSR report and 20, and your goals for the future, talk a little bit about your 20, 30 sustainability strategy and goals, what they are. But, but since you have a such great experience at this and at the company, you’re in a rare position, which gives you great clarity, but also, unfortunately, and unfortunately, you see all the voids in the planet and how do you choose in strata, what to attack first in terms of goals and making the biggest impact and making the world, better care for a better world in terms of making the biggest impact that you can during the next 5, 6 years, 7 years ahead of us.

Lisa: Yeah, that is the question of the day. I would say John really because…

John: Give me the process. I want to hear your process.

Lisa: Yeah, [crosstalk]

John: I want a word from you.

Lisa: Right. Sustainability can be defined so many different ways…

John: Yeah.

Lisa: … depending on, it’s in the eye of the beholder to a great degree, isn’t it? For us, the process is actually one of looking at two core aspects, one is from the inside of the business out, like looking inside the company out, what are our impacts on the world? The greenhouse gas emissions that come from our manufacturing, our products, et cetera, inside-out impacts. The second lens is outside in what’s happening outside of the company, that has the potential to impact our business, whether that’s regulatory developments or to your point earlier, shifting customer, consumer perspectives and attitudes around sustainability, et cetera. Outside influences into the company, and we look at those then through two lenses, one risk if we look across that horizon, what risks do we see to the business? Then secondly, and probably, as importantly is, are the opportunities that it creates. We know that we can’t touch every aspect of what some may define as sustainability, but when we look at those two outside in inside out philosophies, through the lens of our teams, our key stakeholders, we’re able to really narrow the focus down to a critical few areas that we really want to lean in hard for and drive some big impact around and those are those sustainability goals we talked about earlier.

John: Right. This is the Impact podcast and impact has become, usually, when I first started this podcast, Lisa, it was called Green Is Good, which was a take on Gordon Gekko’s “Greed is Good.” We trademarked it and that’s how we started as a radio show. There was no podcast when we started this show. Plus we also don’t take advertising dollars because we wanted to be able to curate the show with great people and great brands like yours and not be bought and sold and anyone think we’re hawking anyone’s products and we’re not on anyone’s payroll because we’re not. Social impact has become part of our vernacular and part of our lexicon now. Can you share some of the social impact projects that you and your colleagues are working on that you’re most proud of at Kimberly-Clark?

Lisa: Oh, sure. I’m going to have to succumb to a call out for our Kotex brand here, John. The Kotex brand has done some really incredible work under the banner of Kotex She Can. The brand has at its heart a belief that a woman’s period or a girls period should never get in the way of her progress.

John: Right.

Lisa: They think about how they can provide education services, information about menstrual hygiene, health access, to menstruation solutions, education, and sponsorship of school programs in various parts of the world. Then partnerships that allow them to amplify some of that support that they offer. That’s a key point of pride and around the world, Kotex activates under that banner and designs initiatives that are most relevant to that market and to this specific consumer and community need that they see. You can look all over the world at the Kotex brand and see activations that are very much in that space, right, empowering women and girls.

John: Also, you have one Toilets Change Lives.

Lisa: Yes.

John: Can we talk about that. I know these are a little bit off they sound in abstract they sound a little bit weird. But they’re not because this is part of our daily lives and functions. You can make a huge impact when you’re impacting people’s daily lives and functions.

Lisa: Yeah, you sure can. That’s the business we’re in, right?

John: Right.

Lisa: Helping to support all those essential needs that people have to get on with their lives so no question. Toilets Change Lives is a program that’s been in place for several years now that runs in support of our bath tissue business, quite frankly, our intimate care business, we call it. It’s really very much recognizing that it’s great to have your toilet paper, but if you don’t have running water in the toilet, it’s missing a key component and element of that need that people have. The program is very much about providing access to improved or enhanced sanitation for parts in parts of the world that don’t have it and it’s shockingly a common issue all over the world. The brands very much endeavor to tackle that problem around access to clean water and sanitation through toilets do in fact change lives. When you have access to it, and you don’t know that until you don’t.

John: Right.

Lisa: Right.

John: For our listeners and viewers who have just joined us, we’re so honored to have with us today, Lisa Morden, she’s the Vice President of safety, sustainability, and occupational health at Kimberly-Clark. To find Lisa and her great colleagues doing important work at Kimberly-Clark, you go to www.kimberly-clark.com. Lisa, before the pandemic in the role that you have which, obviously, is those three critical titles of occupational health, safety, and sustainability, did you have to travel a lot to go look at different vendors, facilities, meet employees around the world? How much of your life was back in your home base and how much was on the road?

Lisa: We try and get out into the field as much as we can, John, is our mantra here.

John: Right.

Lisa: We have such a diverse manufacturing footprint and our business teams are spread out on virtually every region of the world at this point. To truly understand to your point earlier about our process to really get the right insights from the different markets and folks around the world to help us design our sustainability plans and frameworks, you have to go and sit with them. You have to tour the markets with them. You have to talk with their teams. You have to really dig in to shape something that can be globally relevant, but locally customizable for the needs that we have around the world. Yes, so, long story short, plenty of time in airplanes. I think of course though, the pandemic has shifted that dramatically, and we’ve become so much more adept now at connecting virtually like you and I are doing today, right?

John: Yeah, that’s true. What will be, and I don’t want to ever call it new normal, because again, it’s such a bad, I think, use of terminology. I’d like to say a new better. If we’re going to talk about better care for a better world, let’s just call it the new better post-pandemic. What will be the right balance in the new better world in terms of getting the face-to-face interaction that’s critical for team building, and bridge building, but also being sensitive to the environmental impact that planes have? Also, the health impact it has on us as the travelers. I think none of us, I speak for myself, I don’t think any of us mind being on planes less.

Lisa: I can’t disagree with you there. No question.

John: What do you think the new better looks like in terms of home office versus having to be in the field in the years ahead? How much does it change?

Lisa: John, I think it’s going to shift materially actually simply because our way of working now is much more dynamic and flexible, I would say overall. It can’t replace the face-to-face relationship building. I think that is so critical in a lot of ways. But we’re becoming much more comfortable in building those relationships at two dimensions versus three, I think. That being said, for us, there’s always going to be a need for what we call the go and see. There’s nothing that can replace the boots on the ground, being out in the stores, the retail environment, being out in our manufacturing facilities if we’re thinking about occupational safety and helping to build capabilities and help to grow the talent and build the talent across the organization for some of these health, safety, and sustainability-related principles. There will be a new balance I think that we strike. Well-being from my perspective is also something that the world obviously is much more aware of or attuned to how am I feeling when I’m on an airplane 70% of my time? Probably not great.

John: Right.

Lisa: We need our teams to be energized and engaged and taking care of their own well-being and mental health and well-being as well.

John: I’m with you.

Lisa: I think we’re going to find a new balance, honestly, that allows us to connect digitally more effectively, but not lose that in person on occasion touchpoint.

John: If we’re going to shift over to the issue of climate space and climate change, that’s become sort of a hot-button topic over the years, but I’m sitting and talking with you today in Fresno, California, it’s 115 degrees here. This is the hottest summer we’ve ever seen in Fresno. I know most of the other regions around the country have seen huge shifts in their weather patterns over the last 30 or 40 years. No matter what people say, if they believe or don’t believe, they can have their own opinion, but the facts are the facts.

Lisa: Yeah.

John: What’s Kimberly-Clark’s achievements been that make you proud of your work and your colleagues work at Kimberly-Clark in the climate space?

Lisa: With the long history of focusing on environmental sustainability, operational efficiency, and operational excellence, we’ve got this really great rhythm in the organization about how we can continuously drive improvements in energy efficiency and energy use reduction. Which, of course, has a benefit in terms of the climate emissions that we can reduce and have reduced over the years. Over the past decade, I would say we’ve also really been focused on looking at renewable technologies and alternative energy as well, and have been plugging in creative new technologies that are much more efficient, but also potentially lower carbon, lower-cost alternatives. Certainly, in this day and age too, where energy prices are certainly headed one direction and are quite high at this point in time, some of these projects are really helping the business quite frankly to be more resilient and navigate through some of those inflationary pressures, if you will. One example that I would point to just recently from the company is our UK business has recently announced plans to work on a green hydrogen project with some partners to support our Barrow Mill in the UK. That’s really new technology, right? That has great potential in the decarbonization replacement for natural gas. It’s not a done deal yet. We need to get some grant funding to support the work, but the collaboration there and the innovation, the technology, the decarbonized the tissue manufacturing environment, and take us to the next level of greenhouse gas emissions reduction is just incredibly exciting. You see a lot more trends I think these days where we find the big wins is when we’re collaborating with external stakeholders as well, right? It’s not necessarily our invention, or it’s not necessarily even our capital investment, but it’s the partnership and the collaboration that we’re finding that allows us to additionally improve the electrical grid or decarbonize our operations. Those are the things that the teams are quite excited and proud to be part of.

John: Then we go from the hot topic, and no pun intended of climate change and making improvements in the climate movement to the issue of plastics. Plastics for consumer products companies, all consumer products companies, and no one’s immune from both the benefits that plastics have given us, but also the knowledge that we have now is much different than we had 30, 40, 50, or 150 years ago when Kimberly-Clark was started. Can you share some of the goals, but also the challenges you face with regards of shifting the use of plastics from your products and packaging, and where are you going as a company? Because this is another big topic that consumers are very interested in and makes a big difference in the world when groups like Kimberly-Clark shift their perspective on this.

Lisa: Yeah, and it’s very relatable for consumers, isn’t it, right? I think you couple that with some of the images you see of sea life being impacted by plastics in the ocean, etcetera and it’s very concerning to people. It’s a very emotive reaction that we all have when we see that imagery. It’s really important for us to continue to look for alternative solutions if you will, both because it’s important to our customers and our consumers, but I think it matters to our employees as well frankly.

John: Right.

Lisa: It is one of, frankly, the most substantial challenges that we face for our 2030 ambitions. It’s one of the most ambitious goals I think that we have, and the solutions aren’t crystal clear for us at this point in time. We acknowledge plastics play a very beneficial place in the world and help with health and hygiene, et cetera. But you can’t deny some of the environmental concerns that have emerged pretty dramatically on the global stage, over the last several years. I would say our approach is threefold. First, we’re looking to, again, improve material efficiency because that’s just smart and good business, right?

John: Right.

Lisa: Use less stuff to get the same outcome is a key part of the strategy. Alternatives for virgin fossil fuel-based plastics is another lever. How do we think about bio-based recycled contents even biodegradable? The definitions around all of that are challenging. The innovation pipeline is not ideal yet, quite honestly, no, crystal clear answers to solve for those dilemmas. But the third one then is around thinking about, you touched on circularity earlier, and so how do you optimize circular material flows and or the end-of-life solutions for products like ours. I always talk about the fact that, when you’re thinking about personal hygiene products, there’s a very high Ig factor associated with end-of-life right? It adds a whole new layer of complexity and challenge to the equation for us. But if there is one area that I think I’ve seen our brand and our innovation teams really rally, it’s around this particular challenge. There’s regulatory challenges, and cost challenges, and systems challenges and we know that we won’t solve the problem just as Kimberly-Clark alone, right? It’s again, that partnership model is going to be key. But it’s just been incredibly inspirational despite all of those challenges to see how our teams have rallied around those challenges and have begun to really challenge the prevailing thinking as we go forward. It’s exciting stuff.

John: One of the other points I want to make is what I’ve learned in this journey of doing these interviews over 15 years, Lisa, is that companies like yours are run with great people like you and your colleagues, and we’re just people. There’s nobody at Kimberly-Clark and you included, and me included as just someone who’s interacting with you today, that doesn’t want our children and our grandchildren to breathe cleaner air and drink cleaner water. We’re all in this together in terms of finding good solutions to these very difficult issues. These issues aren’t easy, scientifically not easy, and shifting 150 years of experience and practices isn’t easy either.

Lisa: That’s so true. True and a lot this is systems change, right?

John: Yes.

Lisa: The system is designed to get exactly the outcomes that the world has today. Shifting those systems is an uphill climb, quite candidly. They are quite optimized to do exactly what they do. As we contemplate how to intervene and disrupt those, it’s going to require some pretty breakthrough thinking and some pretty bold ambitions if you will. Yeah.

John: Absolutely. In terms of, before we did this interview, I read about your Heirs’ Property Support Initiative…

Lisa: Yeah.

John: …and its connection to some of your Fiber Forest Goals. Can you share more about that Heirs’ Property Support Initiative and what that really means to Kimberly-Clark and what that means to the environment around the world?

Lisa: Oh, sure I would love to. It’s an incredibly important program. I would say KC supports the program, John, but it really is the incredible folks at the Center for Heirs’ Property Preservation and the Mississippi Center for Justice that have been leading and driving that program. Okay. Kimberly-Clark and our partners at WWF have helped to support their initiatives, but it’s their talent, motivation, and expertise that are really shifting the discussion. The work they do is about helping Heirs’ property owners to secure their ancestral land and title to their ancestral land where, legally, sometimes that can be challenging or in question. A lot of families that don’t have access to the right legal services can sometimes lose their property. Or, they will sell their property too, and not necessarily reap the value that’s requisite to that property. What that means is oftentimes those ancestral land, which very often is a forested landscape will get sold to a developer or for some other use and that forest gets converted for other uses. To us that’s part of the bread basket where Kimberly-Clark sources fiber for some of our personal care products. We have a really strong interest in helping to support those families in those communities to maintain their ancestral land and their forest land is working for us. It’s good for them for building wealth. It’s good environmentally, because it keeps those forests as forests, and ultimately there’s a shared value that gets created as a result of that work. We’re incredibly honored to be supporting those two organizations and the work that they do. It’s amazing stuff.

John: Lisa, we could spend hours here and I’m on your website and the work that you and your colleagues are doing at Kimberly-Clark is incredible. What’s 30 years behind you, you got 2030 goals coming up that I know someone like you doesn’t want to make goals and not hit them. What does the years ahead look like for you and your great team at Kimberly-Clark?

Lisa: John, you hit the nail on the head, sir. We are very focused on being sure that we hit those 2030 ambitions and goals. To us they are much more than just an ambition. It’s a pipeline that we’re very actively moving towards. But we’re pleased with the fact that sustainability is so embedded in the company’s purpose to deliver care for a better world. Going forward, it’s all about continuing to drive that engagement and activation across our brands supply chain and innovation teams. You mentioned ESG earlier, right? Our list of active participation in the sustainability discussion is growing because of the ESG discussion with investors and others. Certainly, continuing to support our investor teams and our board and our leadership team to help to support the ESG conversation going forward is a big opportunity as well. It’s exciting.

John: Well, for our listeners and viewers, again, to find Lisa and all her great colleagues at Kimberly-Clark and all the important, impactful work they’re doing in sustainability and beyond, you could go to www.kimberlyclark.com. Again, now after this interview, Lisa, our listeners and viewers know why GreenBiz in 2019, named you one of the 25 badass woman shaking up the corporate climate movement. It’s no surprise now. You deserve that title. You’ve earned that title, and it’s truly an honor to have you on the Impact podcast. I’m very grateful and thankful to you for all the impactful, important work that you’re doing to make the world a better place for all of us.

Lisa: Thank you so much, John. It’s been a pleasure to be here with you today. I appreciate the conversation.

John: This episode of the impact podcast is brought to you by Closed Loop Partners. Closed Loop Partners is a leading circular economy investor in the United States with an extensive network of fortune 500 corporate investors, family offices, institutional investors, industry experts, and impact partners. Closed Loops platform spans the arc of capital from venture capital to private equity, bridging gaps and fostering synergies to scale the circular economy. To find Closed Loop Partners, please go to www.closedlooppartners.com.

Menu